Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel

Prueba de AdaBoost

Rastree los alumnos secuenciales de AdaBoost, los errores ponderados, la reponderación de ejemplos, la votación final y la sensibilidad a casos difíciles y ruidosos.

Rutas de guía relacionadasadaboost
Pregunta 1 de 8

How are AdaBoost's weak learners typically trained relative to one another?

Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas

Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.

  1. How are AdaBoost's weak learners typically trained relative to one another?
    • Independently under unchanged sample weights
    • All at once using one common unweighted loss
    • Sequentially, with later rounds adapting to earlier errors
    • By retaining only the final learner and discarding prior rounds
  2. After a learner misclassifies an example, what usually happens to its relative training weight?
    • It becomes identical to the learner's ensemble vote
    • It increases for a subsequent round
    • It is permanently removed after its first misclassification
    • It is reset to equal weight before every subsequent round
  3. In the classic binary formulation, what kind of weighted error earns a useful positive learner vote?
    • An error greater than one-half
    • Any error because the ensemble weight is always positive
    • An error measured only on the final test set
    • A weighted error below one-half
  4. Why can mislabeled outliers be problematic for AdaBoost?
    • They may keep receiving increased weight
    • Reweighting proves that their labels must be correct
    • Each stump automatically removes examples with inconsistent labels
    • Repeated rounds guarantee such examples have no influence
  5. A one-split decision tree is known by what common nickname?
    • Decision forest
    • Decision branch
    • Decision stump
    • Decision ensemble
  6. What combines the sequence of learners into the final AdaBoost prediction?
    • Only the last learner's prediction
    • A weighted vote of their outputs
    • A vote with necessarily equal weights for every learner
    • The prediction of the learner trained on the largest subset alone
  7. What should a practitioner inspect when several examples remain difficult across rounds?
    • Whether high weight alone proves every case is mislabeled
    • Whether all difficult cases should automatically be removed
    • Whether increasing rounds guarantees that all cases become representative
    • Whether they are valid, mislabeled or outside intended use
  8. Which statement about more boosting rounds is justified?
    • More rounds do not guarantee better generalization
    • Lower training error guarantees lower future error
    • Repeated weighting guarantees correction of noisy labels
    • A large ensemble eliminates the need for held-out evaluation