Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel
Cuestionario sobre chatbots de IA, niños y leyes de seguridad en línea
Prueba las reglas de consentimiento de los padres COPPA, los deberes de garantía de edad de la Ley de seguridad en línea del Reino Unido y los protocolos y demandas de chatbot complementarios de la SB 243 de California.
Pregunta 1 de 8
Under COPPA, what must a covered service get before collecting personal information from a child under 13?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- Under COPPA, what must a covered service get before collecting personal information from a child under 13?
- A signed statement from the child's school
- Verifiable parental consent
- A government ID from the child
- Nothing, as long as the data is encrypted
- Which UK regulator enforces the Online Safety Act and has said generative AI chatbots can fall within its scope?
- The Information Commissioner's Office
- The Competition and Markets Authority
- ofcom
- The Financial Conduct Authority
- Which requirement is part of California's SB 243 for companion chatbots?
- Protocols to prevent content encouraging suicide or self-harm and to refer users to crisis services
- A ban on all chatbots for anyone under 18
- Licensing every chatbot through the state medical board
- Storing all conversations on servers in California
- What does SB 243 require for users the operator knows are minors?
- Showing ads only from approved vendors
- Requiring a parent to sit in on every session
- Deleting every chat after 24 hours
- Periodic reminders to take a break and that the chatbot is not human, plus reasonable measures to prevent sexually explicit content
- Why is a "13+" checkbox often not enough for compliance?
- Checkboxes are illegal in the UK
- Many rules turn on actual knowledge, the likely audience, or reasonable measures, not just what users say about their age
- COPPA applies only to users over 18
- A checkbox counts as verifiable parental consent
- Why do self-harm safety systems score risk across a whole conversation, not only message by message?
- Single messages are too short to be classified
- The law forbids reading individual messages
- Risk can build up gradually over many turns, especially in long role-play sessions
- Scoring whole conversations is cheaper
- What was notable about the 2025 ruling in Garcia v. Character Technologies?
- The court allowed most claims to proceed instead of dismissing the case
- The case was dismissed because chatbots cannot be sued
- The company was ordered to shut down
- The FTC took over the lawsuit
- Which age assurance method does the guide describe as the weakest?
- Age verification against an ID
- Age estimation from face signals
- Third-party age credentials
- Self-declaration