Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel

¿Quién es responsable cuando la IA causa daño? cuestionario

Prueba la negligencia y la responsabilidad del producto para la IA, la cobertura del software de la Directiva revisada de responsabilidad del producto de la UE y la sentencia del chatbot de Air Canada.

Pregunta 1 de 8

¿Qué decidió el tribunal en el caso Moffatt contra Air Canada?

Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas

Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.

  1. ¿Qué decidió el tribunal en el caso Moffatt contra Air Canada?
    • The chatbot was a separate legal entity responsible for its own statements
    • The customer should have ignored the chatbot
    • Air Canada was responsible for the chatbot's incorrect information
    • The chatbot's developer alone was liable
  2. ¿Qué significa responsabilidad estricta del producto?
    • The injured person does not have to prove the manufacturer was at fault, only the defect, damage and causal link
    • The manufacturer is never liable
    • Only criminal penalties apply
    • The user must prove intent to harm
  3. ¿Cómo trata el software la Directiva revisada de responsabilidad de productos de la UE?
    • It excludes all software
    • It covers only embedded firmware
    • It covers only open-source code
    • It explicitly treats software, including AI systems, as a product
  4. ¿Qué pasó con la propuesta de Directiva de responsabilidad de la IA de la UE?
    • It entered into force in 2024
    • It was dropped after the Commission said in February 2025 it expected no agreement
    • It merged into the GDPR
    • It became a US federal law
  5. ¿Qué nuevos tipos de daños cubre la directiva europea revisada?
    • Destruction or corruption of non-professional data
    • Lost stock market profits
    • Reputational harm to competitors
    • Fines from regulators
  6. In Mata v. Avianca, who was held responsible for fake citations produced by ChatGPT?
    • OpenAI
    • el secretario del tribunal
    • El partido contrario
    • The lawyers who filed the brief
  7. Under the revised EU directive, what happens when someone substantially modifies a product?
    • All liability disappears
    • Only the original manufacturer remains liable
    • The modifier can be treated as a manufacturer
    • The product is automatically banned
  8. How does the revised EU directive help claimants with complex AI systems?
    • It requires AI to testify
    • It lets courts order evidence disclosure and presume defect or causation when proof is excessively difficult
    • It sets a fixed payout for every AI harm
    • It removes the need to show any damage