Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel
Prueba de sesgos y estereotipos en los generadores de imágenes de IA
Prueba de dónde proviene el sesgo del generador de imágenes, cómo lo miden los investigadores con indicaciones neutrales y por qué correcciones como la reescritura de indicaciones pueden sobrecorregir.
Pregunta 1 de 8
Why does a prompt that does not mention gender or ethnicity still produce a biased image?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- Why does a prompt that does not mention gender or ethnicity still produce a biased image?
- The model randomly assigns attributes with equal probability
- The model falls back on the most typical picture it learned for the word, which reflects skewed data
- Users secretly add hidden terms
- Image generators cannot draw people accurately
- What kind of data do models like Stable Diffusion learn from?
- Hand-drawn images commissioned for training
- Government census photographs
- Large collections of image-caption pairs scraped from the web
- Only stock photos with verified demographics
- What is a common method researchers use to measure bias in image generators?
- Asking the model to rate its own fairness
- Counting how many words are in each prompt
- Checking image file sizes
- Generating many images for neutral prompts and comparing who appears
- Why did the Stable Bias project use clustering instead of directly labeling race?
- Labeling someone's race from an image is itself unreliable and fraught
- Clustering is required by law
- Race labels made the images too large
- The images contained no people
- What did a 2023 Bloomberg analysis of Stable Diffusion images find?
- Outputs were perfectly balanced across all jobs
- Only landscapes showed bias
- High-paying jobs skewed toward lighter-skinned men
- The model refused to draw people at work
- What happened with Google's Gemini image generation in February 2024?
- It was paused after producing historically inaccurate diverse depictions
- It was praised for perfect historical accuracy
- It was banned in all countries
- It stopped generating landscapes
- What is the main weakness of simple behind-the-scenes prompt rewriting as a fix?
- It is too expensive to run
- It can be context-blind and alter prompts that specify a period or identity
- It makes images black and white
- It deletes the training data
- Which statement about the source of bias is accurate according to the guide?
- Bias comes only from training data
- Bias comes only from users' prompts
- Bias is fully solved by larger models
- Data, filtering, captioning, model design and post-training choices all shape bias