Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · duro Nivel
Prueba explicada de la Ley de IA de Colorado (SB 24-205)
Prueba cómo la Ley de IA de Colorado define los sistemas de alto riesgo y la discriminación algorítmica, los deberes del desarrollador y el implementador, y su aplicación y demora.
Pregunta 1 de 8
Under SB 24-205, what makes an AI system high-risk?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- Under SB 24-205, what makes an AI system high-risk?
- It uses more than a set amount of computing power
- It is sold to government agencies
- It makes, or is a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision
- It generates images or video
- To what date did the August 2025 special session delay the law's effective date?
- 30 de junio de 2026
- February 1, 2026
- 1 de enero de 2025
- December 31, 2027
- Who enforces the Colorado AI Act?
- Any consumer through a private lawsuit
- La Comisión Federal de Comercio
- The Colorado Attorney General exclusively
- Each county court
- Which is a deployer duty rather than a developer duty?
- Providing documentation on training data to customers
- Publishing a summary of high-risk systems the company develops
- Reporting discovered discrimination risks to deployers who use its system
- Completing impact assessments and notifying consumers about AI use in decisions
- What must happen after an adverse consequential decision made with a high-risk system?
- The consumer receives an automatic refund
- The consumer receives the principal reasons, a chance to correct data and an appeal where feasible
- The system must be shut down
- The developer must publish the consumer's file
- Following which framework can support an affirmative defense under the law?
- The NIST AI Risk Management Framework
- La Ley Sarbanes-Oxley
- The General Data Protection Regulation
- The Americans with Disabilities Act
- How does the Colorado law mainly differ from the EU AI Act?
- It covers every AI system with equal obligations
- It bans more AI practices than the EU law
- It focuses on algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions rather than banned practices and conformity assessments
- It applies only to AI developed outside the US
- Within how many days must a developer report discovered discrimination risks to the Attorney General and known deployers?
- 10 dias
- 30 dias
- 365 days
- 90 days