Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · duro Nivel

Prueba de resolución de correferencias

Las pruebas mencionan identidad, anáfora pronominal, razonamiento de Winograd, errores posteriores, clasificación de tramos, señales lingüísticas, vinculación de entidades y evaluación de sesgos.

Rutas de guía relacionadasResolución de correferencia
Pregunta 1 de 8

When grouping Maria and she in Maria said she was tired, what identity relationship does coreference resolution investigate?

Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas

Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.

  1. When grouping Maria and she in Maria said she was tired, what identity relationship does coreference resolution investigate?
    • Whether the two mentions refer to the same entity
    • Whether the passage must be translated first
    • Whether both words have the same spelling
    • Whether the sentence has exactly two punctuation marks
  2. Linking a pronoun to an earlier expression for the same referent is a familiar example of which relation?
    • Document-level sentiment classification
    • Segmentación de imágenes
    • Pronominal anaphora
    • Alphabetical token sorting
  3. ¿Por qué la frase "El trofeo no cabía en la maleta porque era demasiado grande" es un caso clásico (un esquema de Winograd)?
    • Contiene un error ortográfico.
    • No tiene ningún pronombre
    • Está escrito en voz pasiva.
    • Decidir a qué se refiere "eso" requiere conocimiento del mundo real, no solo gramática
  4. ¿Por qué es importante la resolución de correferencias para tareas como resúmenes y respuestas a preguntas?
    • Hace que la fuente del texto sea más grande.
    • Equivocarse a qué entidad se refiere una palabra conduce a resultados erróneos o confusos
    • Acelera el disco duro del ordenador.
    • Sólo sirve para poesía.
  5. How do influential span-ranking coreference models construct mention links?
    • By requiring all names to be alphabetically adjacent
    • By deleting every pronoun before analyzing identity
    • By scoring candidate mentions and potential earlier antecedents
    • By assigning every span the same database record
  6. Which information can provide cues for a coreference model without guaranteeing a correct link?
    • Mention distance, grammatical agreement, and contextual information
    • Text color alone
    • The speed at which the user typed
    • A requirement that occupation stereotypes determine gender
  7. What extra step distinguishes entity linking from grouping coreferent mentions inside a document?
    • Counting how many pronouns appear without resolving them
    • Associating a mention with a disambiguated external knowledge-base entry
    • Changing every mention to uppercase
    • Requiring every mention to be a different entity
  8. What does WinoBias examine through occupation-based, Winograd-style pronoun examples?
    • The screen resolution used to display occupations
    • A guarantee that every occupation has one gender
    • The file size of every trained model
    • Differences between pro-stereotypical and anti-stereotypical coreference performance