Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel
Prueba de algoritmo de maximización de expectativas
Siga el paso E y el paso M en modelos de variables latentes y distinga la mejora de la probabilidad de la optimización global o la validez del modelo.
Pregunta 1 de 8
What does the E-step calculate using current parameters?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- What does the E-step calculate using current parameters?
- Conditional expectations of complete-data quantities or log likelihood
- The global maximum of observed likelihood
- Hard labels for every hidden variable by necessity
- A new validation dataset
- In a Gaussian mixture, what do responsibilities represent?
- Fixed labels known before fitting
- Posterior membership probabilities for observations across components
- Component means multiplied by covariances
- The number of EM iterations remaining
- What does the M-step do after expectations are computed?
- Changes the number of features automatically
- Replaces all observations with component labels
- Maximizes the expected complete-data objective over parameters
- Computes the validation likelihood only
- What guarantee does exact EM provide under suitable assumptions?
- The selected model is scientifically correct
- It finds the unique global optimum
- Every hidden assignment becomes certain
- Observed-data likelihood does not decrease at each iteration
- Different EM initializations end at different likelihoods. What does this suggest?
- The E-step is unnecessary
- The optimization is sensitive to starts and may have local optima
- The data contain no latent variables
- All parameter estimates are unbiased
- Why are mixture responsibilities not automatically hard assignments?
- They are class labels copied from the target
- They are always equal for every observation
- They are probabilities that can distribute one observation across components
- They represent only missing data
- What does a small likelihood improvement at stopping indicate?
- The latent structure has causal meaning
- The model is proven adequate
- The global optimum is certain
- The chosen numerical convergence criterion was met
- How does generalized EM differ from exact EM?
- Its M-step may increase the expected objective without fully maximizing it
- It removes the latent variables
- It guarantees a global optimum
- It replaces likelihood with classification accuracy