Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel

Prueba de hipótesis sobre billetes de lotería

Compruebe su comprensión de los billetes de lotería, la inicialización, la poda y los límites de las afirmaciones sobre redes neuronales dispersas.

Rutas de guía relacionadasHipótesis del billete de lotería
Pregunta 1 de 8

¿Qué es un "boleto ganador" en esta hipótesis?

Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas

Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.

  1. ¿Qué es un "boleto ganador" en esta hipótesis?
    • Una subred dispersa que, entrenada desde su inicio original, coincide con la red completa
    • Una red con más parámetros de lo habitual
    • Un modelo previamente entrenado descargado de Internet.
    • Un conjunto de hiperparámetros adivinados aleatoriamente
  2. In the original lottery-ticket experiments, what was paired with the discovered sparse mask when retraining a ticket?
    • Fresh random values for every surviving weight
    • The surviving weights’ matched original initialization
    • A different architecture for each pruning round
    • The final trained weights with no resetting
  3. ¿Quién propuso la hipótesis del billete de lotería?
    • Buen compañero (2014)
    • Krizhevsky, Sutskever, Hinton (2012)
    • Frankle y Carbin (2018)
    • Plata y colegas (2016)
  4. Which procedure did the original Lottery Ticket Hypothesis paper use to identify winning tickets?
    • Randomly remove a fixed half of all weights once
    • Iterative magnitude pruning with a reset to the original initialization
    • Add dropout after each pruning round
    • Increase the learning rate after every epoch
  5. How should the idea that overparameterization helps optimization find a trainable sparse structure be described?
    • A conjecture or proposed explanation, not a result established by the original experiments
    • A theorem proven for every neural-network architecture
    • A guarantee that all weights can be removed without loss
    • A claim that pruning eliminates the need for training data
  6. What does a strong lottery-ticket result claim in its theoretical setting?
    • Every randomly initialized network already solves any task
    • A sufficiently overparameterized randomly initialized network can contain a pruned subnetwork that approximates a target without further weight training
    • Pruning always preserves the trained model’s accuracy
    • A sparse network never needs data
  7. What does iterative magnitude pruning remove at each pruning step?
    • The training examples with the lowest labels
    • The neurons with the most outgoing connections
    • Weights with the smallest magnitudes
    • All weights in the final layer
  8. Which datasets were used in the original paper’s reported lottery-ticket experiments?
    • ImageNet and COCO only
    • LibriSpeech and Common Voice
    • SQuAD and GLUE
    • MNIST and CIFAR-10