Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel

Estimación de MAP y cuestionario de antecedentes

Conecte la probabilidad y antes del modo posterior, identifique las correspondencias previas L1 y L2 y distinga MAP de la inferencia posterior completa.

Rutas de guía relacionadasEstimación de mapas y antecedentes
Pregunta 1 de 8

Which quantity does MAP maximize?

Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas

Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.

  1. Which quantity does MAP maximize?
    • The posterior density given the observed data
    • The likelihood alone, regardless of the prior
    • The prior density alone, regardless of observed data
    • The marginal likelihood integrated over all parameter values
  2. What does MLE maximize compared with MAP?
    • The posterior including a prior
    • The likelihood
    • The prior density only
    • The posterior interval width
  3. Which prior commonly yields an L2-style coefficient penalty in MAP?
    • A Laplace prior, whose log density gives an absolute-value penalty
    • A uniform prior, which is constant within its support
    • A zero-centered Gaussian prior, whose negative log density gives a squared penalty
    • A point mass at zero, which fixes every coefficient to zero
  4. Which prior commonly yields an L1-style penalty?
    • A Gaussian prior, which gives a squared-magnitude penalty
    • A uniform prior, which gives no penalty within its support
    • A point mass at zero, which fixes the parameter
    • A Laplace prior, whose negative log density gives an absolute-value penalty
  5. Why can MAP differ from MLE with limited data?
    • MAP discards the likelihood when data are limited
    • The prior can pull the estimate toward values it favors
    • MLE always returns a zero estimate with small samples
    • MAP selects the single observation with the largest value
  6. What does a MAP point estimate provide by itself?
    • A point estimate that also specifies a credible interval
    • The full posterior distribution over all parameter values
    • The posterior mode, without a full uncertainty summary
    • A guarantee that the assumed prior is correct
  7. Why can prior sensitivity analysis be informative?
    • It guarantees that posterior and prior distributions are identical
    • It proves that a likelihood is misspecified whenever the MAP changes
    • It removes the need to inspect observed data
    • It shows whether conclusions change under plausible prior choices
  8. Why may a posterior mode change under reparameterization?
    • A density changes with the coordinate system, so its mode need not map invariantly
    • The likelihood stops depending on observations after transformation
    • A posterior mode is invariant by definition for every nonlinear map
    • Reparameterization converts a continuous parameter into a class label