Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · duro Nivel
Prueba de validación cruzada anidada
Verifique las funciones de los pliegues internos y externos, preprocese las fugas y los cálculos de recuento de ajustes en un práctico flujo de trabajo de validación cruzada anidado.
Pregunta 1 de 8
Dentro de una división externa, ¿qué datos puede utilizar la búsqueda de hiperparámetros internos?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- Dentro de una división externa, ¿qué datos puede utilizar la búsqueda de hiperparámetros internos?
- All examples, including the outer test fold
- Only the outer training data
- Only the outer test labels
- The full dataset after fitting preprocessing globally
- ¿Por qué informar la mejor puntuación de validación interna puede exagerar el rendimiento del modelo?
- Inner cross-validation evaluates every candidate on its own training rows
- Averaging across folds removes all uncertainty from candidate rankings
- The best inner score already includes an independent outer evaluation
- Choosing the best setting also selects favorable variation in validation scores
- Cinco pliegues exteriores, tres pliegues interiores y diez configuraciones candidatas requieren ¿cuántos candidatos internos caben en el ejemplo de la guía?
- 150
- 18
- 50
- 30
- Se instala un escalador en el conjunto de datos completo antes de que comience la validación cruzada anidada. ¿Qué problema persiste?
- Using more outer folds automatically removes preprocessing leakage
- Unsupervised preprocessing cannot use information relevant to evaluation
- Preprocessing has already accessed held-out information
- A scaler can safely see test inputs whenever it does not see test labels
- Diferentes pliegues exteriores seleccionan diferentes hiperparámetros. ¿Cómo debería interpretarse esto?
- It proves the cross-validation code is broken
- It can occur because each selection step sees different training data
- It means only the highest-scoring outer model is valid
- It requires replacing outer evaluation with training accuracy
- A dataset contains many rows per customer, and deployment targets unseen customers. Which design addresses that dependence?
- Shuffle all rows separately in the outer loop only
- Group customers only after evaluation is complete
- Fit the feature selector globally before splitting
- Keep customer groups separated in both inner and outer splits
- After evaluating a fixed nested procedure, how does the guide recommend obtaining a final model?
- Run the selection procedure on development data and fit the chosen configuration
- Deploy the outer-fold model with the highest observed test score
- Choose the configuration from the single best inner-fold result
- Choose final settings by comparing candidates on the reserved test set
- Why is the spread of outer-fold scores not automatically a confidence interval?
- Each outer score is an independent measurement from an unrelated training set
- The raw standard deviation of fold scores is itself a confidence interval
- The fitted models share much of their training data
- Averaging fold scores removes all sampling uncertainty