Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel
Prueba de sobreajuste y desajuste
Revise los patrones de ajuste, la sensibilidad de la muestra, las opciones de representación, los roles de validación y prueba, el doble descenso y el ruido bajo un conjunto de información fijo.
Pregunta 1 de 8
Under comparable train and held-out conditions, an illustrative model scores 98% on training and 71% on held-out data. Which fitting concern is consistent with that gap?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- Under comparable train and held-out conditions, an illustrative model scores 98% on training and 71% on held-out data. Which fitting concern is consistent with that gap?
- Underfitting because training performance is necessarily poor
- A guarantee that the held-out set has no information
- Overfitting to training-specific patterns
- Proof that every larger model will fix the gap
- Which performance pattern can be consistent with a model underfitting useful structure?
- Poor performance on both its training and held-out data
- Excellent training performance with poor held-out performance only
- Guaranteed perfect performance on both datasets
- A guarantee that the objective is minimized globally
- In a bias-variance analysis, what does high estimator variance concern?
- An unavoidable lack of any measurement noise
- Sensitivity of fitted predictions to which training sample is used
- A guarantee that the model is a linear function
- The wall-clock time of a training epoch
- A house-price model has too limited a representation of relevant inputs and fits poorly. Which candidate change should be evaluated?
- Removing all relevant inputs without evaluation
- Assuming a bigger model must always be correct
- Using the final test set repeatedly as training data
- Adding useful features or comparing a more suitable model representation
- ¿Por qué es esencial un conjunto de pruebas o validación retenido para detectar el sobreajuste?
- Mide el rendimiento a partir de datos de los que el modelo no aprendió, lo que revela la brecha de generalización.
- Hace que el entrenamiento sea más rápido
- Garantiza que el modelo nunca cometerá errores.
- Reemplaza la necesidad de una función de pérdida.
- What pattern is called model-size double descent in the studied examples?
- Every dataset must produce exactly the same error curve
- Training loss is halved exactly twice on every epoch
- Test error can rise near an interpolation regime and then fall as capacity increases
- Two models are always trained and averaged
- Why should the final test set be kept separate from repeated model-selection choices?
- It must be used for every learning-rate decision
- It guarantees zero future prediction error
- It removes the need for validation data
- Repeated selection on it can make the final reported estimate optimistic
- In a squared-error bias-variance decomposition with fixed information and observation conditions, what can model-capacity changes alone fail to remove?
- The definition of the model title
- The conditional noise component
- Every possible systematic bias by definition
- The requirement to calculate predictions