Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel

Cuestionario sobre derecho de publicidad y réplicas digitales de IA

Pone a prueba los conceptos básicos del derecho a la publicidad, la Ley ELVIS de Tennessee y las réplicas de las leyes de California, la Ley NO FAKES propuesta y cómo la Sección 230 afecta las reclamaciones.

Rutas de guía relacionadasDerecho de publicidad y réplicas digitales de IA
Pregunta 1 de 8

Which pre-AI cases held advertisers liable for imitating singers' distinctive voices?

Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas

Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.

  1. Which pre-AI cases held advertisers liable for imitating singers' distinctive voices?
    • Thaler v. Vidal and Hepp v. Facebook
    • Roe v. Wade and Miranda v. Arizona
    • Sony v. Universal and Feist v. Rural
    • Midler v. Ford and Waits v. Frito-Lay
  2. What notable step did the ELVIS Act take beyond earlier publicity laws?
    • It created liability for distributing tools whose primary purpose is producing unauthorized replicas
    • It made all AI music illegal in Tennessee
    • It gave copyright protection to voices
    • It applied only to people who have died
  3. When did the ELVIS Act take effect?
    • January 1, 2023
    • 1 de marzo de 2025
    • July 1, 2024
    • It has not taken effect
  4. What does California's AB 2602 address?
    • Criminal penalties for political deepfakes
    • Contract terms for digital replicas that lack specific uses or proper representation
    • Tax credits for AI film production
    • Registration of voices with the state
  5. What was the status of the federal NO FAKES Act as of late 2025?
    • It was struck down by the Supreme Court
    • It was replaced by the ELVIS Act nationwide
    • It became law in 2024
    • It had been introduced and reintroduced but not enacted
  6. Why is copyright a weak tool against an AI voice clone?
    • Copyright lasts only five years
    • Copyright applies only to images
    • Copyright protects specific recordings, not the sound of a person's voice
    • Copyright requires government registration of voices
  7. How did the Third Circuit treat right of publicity claims in Hepp v. Facebook (2021)?
    • As intellectual property claims that Section 230 does not block
    • As claims fully barred by Section 230
    • As federal criminal matters
    • As matters only for union contracts
  8. What did SAG-AFTRA's 2023 contract require for digital replicas?
    • A complete ban on scanning actors
    • Informed consent and payment for replica use
    • Approval from the FCC
    • Only that replicas be labeled in the credits