Cuestionario vinculado a una guía · Medio Nivel
Validación anticipada para el cuestionario de series temporales
Pruebe los orígenes de las previsiones, las ventanas móviles y ampliables y las fugas basadas en el tiempo en evaluaciones realistas y flujos de trabajo de funciones.
Pregunta 1 de 8
A monthly model trains through June and forecasts July. In an expanding-window evaluation, which history is used for the next August forecast?
Vista previa de cada pregunta8 preguntas
Las respuestas y explicaciones aparecen a medida que realiza el cuestionario.
- A monthly model trains through June and forecasts July. In an expanding-window evaluation, which history is used for the next August forecast?
- August outcomes combined with January through June
- July alone, discarding all earlier months
- January through July
- January through June with months randomly reordered
- Which distinction separates a rolling training window from an expanding one?
- A rolling window retains a recent span while an expanding window accumulates earlier history
- A rolling window accumulates all earlier history while an expanding window retains a fixed recent span
- Both windows retain every historical row; only their forecast horizons differ
- The distinction depends only on how often predictions are issued
- A business makes decisions four weeks ahead. Why might next-day evaluation alone be insufficient?
- Next-day error can be multiplied by 28 to determine four-week-ahead error
- Strong next-day performance guarantees the same ranking of models at four weeks
- The training-window length alone determines which horizon has been evaluated
- The evaluated horizon does not match the actual decision
- A feature averages sales through the same day whose sales are being predicted. Which correction addresses the direct leakage?
- Include the next day's sales in the average as well
- Shift the history so the target day's outcome is excluded
- Fit a larger model to the unshifted feature
- Randomize the order of the evaluation dates
- Why should historical external data reflect publication delays and revisions in a forecast backtest?
- Published revisions may be used whenever they are more accurate
- A feature is safe whenever its observation date precedes the target, regardless of publication date
- Later information may not have been available at the forecast origin
- A time-ordered splitter automatically reconstructs historical releases
- What additional check is needed even after using an ordered splitter such as TimeSeriesSplit?
- Verify that feature preparation did not use future information
- Assume every preprocessing operation is automatically safe
- Use the whole dataset to calculate all target averages
- Replace the forecast horizon with a random split
- Overlapping evaluation horizons produce several forecasts for the same outcome. What should the report specify?
- That every forecast of the same target should be counted as an independent outcome
- That only the forecast with the smallest realized error is retained
- That forecast origins can be discarded once the target date is known
- Whether scoring is by forecast opportunity or aggregated by target time
- Which data condition requires extra care when using TimeSeriesSplit to compare equal-duration test folds?
- Observations arrive on a fixed daily schedule
- Observations are irregularly spaced in time
- Each fold contains the same fixed number of regularly spaced observations
- The training window expands across successive folds