ビジュアルAIガイド
Stable Diffusion: How the Open Text-to-Image Model Works
Stable Diffusion is a family of text-to-image models whose first version, released publicly on August 22, 2022, generates pictures by removing noise in a compressed latent space rather than on raw pixels.
このガイドを聴くAIによるナレーション · ~8 min
このページでは9 分で読めます
概要
Because its weights were downloadable and ran on a single consumer graphics card, it became the base for a large ecosystem of open image tools, fine-tunes and research.
主なポイント
- Stability AI released Stable Diffusion publicly on August 22, 2022 under the CreativeML OpenRAIL-M license, with downloadable weights.
- Stable Diffusion runs diffusion in a compressed latent space; version 1 downsamples images by a factor of 8, so 512 pixels become 64 latent cells.
- Version 1 pairs an 860 million parameter U-Net with a frozen 123 million parameter CLIP ViT-L/14 text encoder.
- Classifier-free guidance blends conditional and unconditional predictions; the reference script uses a guidance scale of 7.5 and 50 sampling steps.
- SDXL enlarged the U-Net about threefold, and Stable Diffusion 3 switched to a rectified-flow transformer with separate text and image weights.
- In November 2025 the UK High Court held that Stable Diffusion's weights do not store copies of Getty's images.
ディープダイブ
Stable Diffusion is a text-to-image model: you type a description, and it produces an image that matches it. It belongs to a class called diffusion models, which learn to turn random noise into a picture one small step at a time. What made it different from earlier systems such as DALL-E 2 was not only quality but access. Stability AI released the first version publicly on August 22, 2022 under the CreativeML OpenRAIL-M license, which allows commercial and non-commercial use with use-based restrictions, and the weights could be downloaded and run locally. Stability's announcement put the memory need at about 6.9 GB of graphics card memory (VRAM).
The research behind it is the latent diffusion model, described by Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser and Bjorn Ommer in 'High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models', first posted to arXiv on December 20, 2021 and published at CVPR 2022. The paper's key idea is to run the expensive diffusion process inside the latent space of a pretrained autoencoder rather than on full-resolution pixels. An autoencoder is a pair of networks: an encoder that compresses an image into a smaller grid of numbers, called a latent, and a decoder that reconstructs the image from it. The authors argued this keeps visual detail while cutting compute, noting that pixel-space diffusion models often need hundreds of GPU days to train.
Generation works in a few distinct stages. First, a text encoder turns the prompt into a sequence of vectors. In version 1, this is a frozen CLIP ViT-L/14 text encoder with 123 million parameters, according to the CompVis model card. Second, the system starts from a latent filled with random noise. Third, a U-Net, a convolutional network with 860 million parameters in version 1, predicts the noise present in that latent, and a sampler removes a portion of it. The U-Net reads the text vectors through cross-attention layers, which let each region of the image look up the words most relevant to it. This loop repeats for a set number of steps, 50 in the reference script. Finally, the autoencoder's decoder converts the clean latent back into pixels. Because the autoencoder downsamples by a factor of 8, a 512 by 512 image is generated as a 64 by 64 latent.
Prompt adherence is controlled by classifier-free guidance, introduced by Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans in July 2022. During training, the text condition is sometimes dropped, so the same network learns both a conditional and an unconditional prediction. At sampling time the two predictions are blended, pushing the result further in the direction the text suggests. The CompVis model card notes that checkpoints v1-3 and v1-4 were trained with 10% text-conditioning dropout for this reason, and the reference script uses a guidance scale of 7.5. Higher scales follow the prompt more literally at the cost of variety.
The training data came from LAION, a nonprofit that publishes large image-text datasets scraped from the web. Per the model card, v1-1 trained for 237,000 steps at 256 by 256 on laion2B-en and then 194,000 steps at 512 by 512 on a high-resolution subset, while later checkpoints continued on 'laion-aesthetics v2 5+', a subset filtered for images a classifier rated as more aesthetic. Stability AI provided compute, Runway collaborated, and LAION supported the work.
Later versions changed the architecture substantially, so claims about 'Stable Diffusion' should name a version. SDXL, described in a paper posted July 4, 2023, uses a U-Net about three times larger than earlier versions, a second text encoder, training on multiple aspect ratios, and an optional refinement model. Stable Diffusion 3, described in 'Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis' (March 5, 2024), replaced the U-Net with a transformer that keeps separate weights for image and text tokens and lets information flow in both directions. It also moved from standard diffusion to rectified flow, a formulation that connects data and noise along a straight line. The authors reported improved typography, text comprehension and human preference ratings.
Compared with closed services such as DALL-E or Midjourney, the main difference is control. With local weights, users can fine-tune on their own images, add control signals such as edge maps, run without per-image fees, and inspect the model. The trade-offs are that the user must supply hardware, manage safety settings, and accept that quality depends heavily on version, sampler and settings. Stability's 2022 release shipped a safety classifier enabled by default, but in a local install it can be adjusted or removed, which raised concern about misuse.
The limitations matter in practice. Version 1 was pretrained at 256 by 256 and finetuned at 512 by 512, so that is the size it was built for, and SDXL's move to multiple aspect ratios and SD3's focus on typography and text comprehension show which weaknesses the developers themselves set out to fix. Because the training images were scraped from the web, the model inherits whatever is over- or under-represented in that data. Copyright remains contested: in Getty Images v Stability AI, decided by the UK High Court in November 2025, Getty dropped its training claim for lack of a UK connection, the judge held the model was not an infringing copy because its weights do not store copies of Getty's images, and a small number of generated Getty watermarks were found to infringe trademarks. Other jurisdictions and cases may reach different conclusions.
04作業例
Tracing one image through Stable Diffusion v1
Write a prompt such as 'a red bicycle leaning on a brick wall' and pick an output size of 512 by 512 pixels.
Compute the latent size: divide each side by the downsampling factor of 8 to get a 64 by 64 latent grid.
Pass the prompt through the CLIP ViT-L/14 text encoder to get a sequence of token vectors, and also encode an empty prompt.
Fill the 64 by 64 latent with random Gaussian noise using a fixed seed so the run is repeatable.
For each of 50 sampler steps, have the U-Net predict noise twice (with and without the prompt), combine them with guidance scale 7.5, and remove part of the noise.
Decode the final latent with the autoencoder decoder to get a 512 by 512 image.
Repeat with the same seed but a guidance scale of 2, then 12, and compare how literally each image follows the prompt.
それが示すもの
Three images from the same seed that differ only in guidance strength. The check is that the seed reproduces the identical image when rerun with identical settings, and that higher guidance produces a closer but less varied match to the prompt.
現実世界の実装
Running the original CompVis txt2img script, which by default samples a 512 by 512 image in 50 PLMS steps with a guidance scale of 7.5, on a single GPU with 10 GB or more of memory.
Inpainting: masking part of a photo and regenerating only that region from a text prompt, a task where the 2022 latent diffusion paper reported state-of-the-art results.
Using SDXL's separate refinement model as a post-hoc image-to-image pass to sharpen detail in images produced by the SDXL base model, as described in the July 2023 SDXL paper.
Comparing the v1-1 through v1-4 checkpoints, which the CompVis model card documents as trained for different numbers of steps on different LAION subsets, to see how data curation changes output style.
Legal analysis: the UK High Court's November 2025 Getty Images v Stability AI judgment examined whether Stable Diffusion's weights store copies of training images and found they do not.
The Future of Stable Diffusion: How the Open Text-to-Image Model Works
Research since 2022 has moved the family away from its original design. The March 2024 SD3 paper reported predictable scaling trends, with lower validation loss tracking better image quality and human preference, which points research toward larger transformer backbones and flow-based training rather than bigger U-Nets. Open questions include how to measure prompt fidelity reliably, how to make text rendering and spatial relationships dependable, and how to cut the number of sampling steps without losing quality. Legal and governance questions remain open. The November 2025 UK judgment in Getty Images v Stability AI was narrow, and Getty had dropped its training claim for lack of a UK connection, so it did not settle whether training on scraped images is lawful elsewhere. Licensing also varies across versions, so users must read the license attached to each release rather than assuming the original OpenRAIL-M terms apply. Safety tooling, such as default output classifiers and provenance labeling, is another active area, because locally run open weights can be modified by anyone who downloads them.
実践する
なぜそれが重要なのか
- 速度とスケール. Visual AI は、検査、検出、タグ付けタスクを大規模に自動化できます。
- ビルドの選択. クリエイティブ チームは、手動での修正を減らし、より迅速にコンセプトのプロトタイプを作成できます。
- チームとワークフロー. 以前は処理が困難であった画像信号やビデオ信号を操作に使用できるようになります。
気をつけてください
- 出所が不明瞭な場合、肖像権と同意が法的リスクとなる可能性があります。
- モデルのパフォーマンスは、照明、人口統計、環境によって異なる場合があります。
- 信頼度のしきい値が監視されない限り、誤検知は気付かれない可能性があります。
次のステップ
- 精度、再現率、エラーコストの許容基準を定義します。
- 実際の生産条件に一致するデータを使用してテストします。
- 信頼性の低い予測や影響の大きい予測については、人間によるレビューを追加します。
- モデルのドリフトを追跡し、カメラまたはデータセットの変更後に再検証します。
出典とさらなる参考文献
- arXiv (CVPR 2022)潜在拡散モデルによる高解像度画像合成
- CompVis, LMU Munich (GitHub)CompVis/stable-diffusion: A latent text-to-image diffusion model
- Stability AIStable Diffusion Public Release
- arXivClassifier-Free Diffusion Guidance
- arXivSDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis
- arXivScaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis
- Society for Computers and LawHigh Court issues eagerly-awaited judgment in Getty v Stability AI case
探検を続けましょう
無料ニュースレター
毎日のAIブリーフィングを受け取る
毎週平日の朝に英語で書かれた3つの検証済みAIストーリー。無料で永続的、広告なし。
毎週平日に1通のメール。ワンクリックで購読解除。住所を販売または共有しません。
自分自身をテストしてください
Take the Stable Diffusion: How the Open Text-to-Image Model Works quiz
すべての回答に即時フィードバック、合格後は検証可能なID付きの共有可能な証明書を取得。
無料AI教育をサポート。AI Understandingは501(c)(3)の非営利団体です — 広告なし、課金壁なし、常に。 寄付をする
よくある質問
What is Stable Diffusion: How the Open Text-to-Image Model Works?
Stable Diffusion is a family of text-to-image models whose first version, released publicly on August 22, 2022, generates pictures by removing noise in a compressed latent space rather than on raw pixels. Because its weights were downloadable and ran on a single consumer graphics card, it became the base for a large ecosystem of open image tools, fine-tunes and research.
大まかに言うと、拡散モデルはどのように画像を生成するのでしょうか?
拡散モデルは、ノイズ処理を逆にすることを学習します。つまり、ノイズから開始して、一貫した画像が現れるまで繰り返しノイズを除去します。
Where does the original Stable Diffusion v1 pipeline perform its learned denoising work?
Latent computation is an architectural choice; hardware suitability still depends on the setup.
How does text condition the documented original Stable Diffusion v1 denoiser?
The v1 description identifies its text encoder and cross-attention conditioning; later versions can differ.
What does classifier-free guidance combine in the documented sampling formula?
The scale controls a combination of predictions and needs evaluation for the chosen model and settings.
Which statement accurately qualifies a change to sampler step count?
The intended sampling regime matters, so evaluate the actual checkpoint and solver.