SeterusnyaPanduan seterusnya
Brazil’s Election Rules on AI and Deepfakes
Masyarakat
PANDUAN Masyarakat
India’s IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules were amended in February 2026 to define synthetically generated information (SGI) and impose due-diligence duties on intermediaries.
The operative definition targets realistic audio, visual or audiovisual content; later 2026 draft amendments are proposals, not current labeling rules.
India’s Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 operate under the Information Technology Act, 2000. Gazette notification G.S.R. 120(E) amended the rules on February 10, 2026, with commencement on February 20. The amendments define synthetically generated information (SGI) as audio, visual or audiovisual information artificially or algorithmically created, generated, modified or altered to appear real, authentic or true and be indistinguishable or likely perceived as indistinguishable from a natural person or real-world event. Pure text by itself is not SGI under that definition, although other due-diligence rules still apply to unlawful text. The definition expressly excludes routine good-faith editing, technical correction or accessibility improvements where the content’s substance or meaning is not materially changed; ordinary document preparation is also excluded unless it creates false documents or electronic records. Under Rule 3(3), intermediaries whose resources enable creation, alteration, publication, transmission or sharing of SGI must deploy reasonable technical measures to prevent SGI that violates applicable law. Permissible SGI must carry a clear, prominent label or notice; audiovisual media use visible labeling, audio uses a prefixed disclosure, and provenance metadata or another technical mechanism with a unique identifier is required to the extent technically feasible. Intermediaries must not enable removal or suppression of these identifiers. Significant social media intermediaries have an additional ex-ante duty under Rule 4(1A): obtain a user declaration before display, upload or publication, use reasonable and proportionate measures to verify it, and ensure confirmed SGI is labeled. The obligations bind intermediaries; they do not amount to a general standalone statute ordering every person who creates AI media to use a specified label. The IT Act safe harbour under section 79 depends on meeting statutory conditions and due diligence; noncompliance does not automatically resolve liability without applying those rules. MeitY’s March and April 2026 Second Amendment drafts proposed further changes, but they remained draft notices without Gazette numbers or commencement dates as of September 26.
Kemudaratan AI malapetaka dan setiap hari bergantung pada siapa yang memahami risiko dan siapa yang boleh bertindak.
Celik awam dan profesional membentuk sama ada dasar keselamatan yang kukuh adalah mungkin dari segi politik.
Penjelasan yang jelas mengurangkan tangkapan oleh gembar-gembur, PR makmal dan teater etika yang tidak jelas.
The operative SGI rules took effect February 20, 2026. MeitY later published Second Amendment drafts in March and April, including proposed changes to label presentation and ministerial guidance powers; as of September 26 no final Gazette notification for those drafts was found. Recheck the Gazette for a final instrument before treating proposed text as law. MeitY has separately circulated draft Second Amendment Rules, but draft text with blank notification and commencement dates does not change the February rules. Keep compliance records tied to the final Gazette instrument and check for a later notification before changing controls.
A platform enabling realistic AI voice or video uploads adds a visible synthetic-content notice and provenance metadata where required by Rule 3(3).
A significant social media intermediary asks uploaders to declare SGI status and uses reasonable technical measures to verify declarations before publication.
A creator uses AI to brighten, stabilize or caption genuine footage without materially changing its meaning; the 2026 rule definition contains specified routine-editing and accessibility exclusions.
A policy team reads a later draft proposal for continuous on-screen labels separately from the operative February 2026 Gazette text.
Merawat risiko kewujudan sebagai sci-fi manakala sebatian keupayaan.
Mengelirukan keselamatan produk permukaan dengan penjajaran di bawah autonomi tinggi.
Meninggalkan khalayak bukan Inggeris dan bukan pakar dengan hanya sumber berkualiti rendah.
Asingkan bahaya produk, penyalahgunaan dan kehilangan kawalan / risiko salah jajaran.
Tanya apakah bukti yang akan mengubah pandangan anda tentang garis masa dan keterukan.
Lebih suka sumber utama dan penilaian konkrit berbanding tuntutan pemasaran.
Kenal pasti satu laluan tindakan: kerjaya, dasar, pembiayaan atau kemahiran — bukan sahaja kesedaran.
Free newsletter
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
India’s IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules were amended in February 2026 to define synthetically generated information (SGI) and impose due-diligence duties on intermediaries. The operative definition targets realistic audio, visual or audiovisual content; later 2026 draft amendments are proposals, not current labeling rules.
G.S.R. 120(E) was notified February 10 and provides that the amendment rules commence February 20, 2026.
The definition is limited to audio, visual or audiovisual information appearing real and likely indistinguishable from real people or events.
The rule excludes routine, good-faith editing or technical correction that does not materially alter or misrepresent content.
The rule calls for a prominent label or disclosure plus persistent provenance metadata or another identifier mechanism to the extent feasible.
Rule 4(1A) requires a user declaration and reasonable verification before display, upload or publication.
Teruskan belajar
Lebih banyak panduan dipilih untuk topik ini
SeterusnyaPanduan seterusnya
Brazil’s Election Rules on AI and Deepfakes
Masyarakat