SeterusnyaPanduan seterusnya
Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act
Masyarakat
PANDUAN Masyarakat
Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act
Utah’s 2024 Artificial Intelligence Policy Act created disclosure duties for generative AI in specified regulated-professional and consumer contexts, alongside an Office of AI Policy and learning laboratory.
Pada halaman ini3 min dibaca
Gambaran keseluruhan
A 2025 law amended the disclosure framework effective May 7, 2025 and extended the chapter’s sunset to July 1, 2027. The current statutory text should guide any compliance decision.
Menyelam dalam
Utah enacted SB 149 in 2024 as the Artificial Intelligence Policy Act, effective May 1, 2024. The initial law used disclosure duties for regulated occupations and consumer transactions and created the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and an AI learning laboratory. In 2025, SB 226, the Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Amendments, substantially revised the disclosure scheme. Its relevant provisions took effect May 7, 2025. As amended, the prior Chapter 72 is scheduled for repeal July 1, 2027. Older summaries of the original SB 149 rules can therefore misstate today’s duties. The current framework distinguishes regulated occupations from other consumer-facing uses. A person in a regulated occupation must disclose use of generative AI in a high-risk interaction, including specified interactions involving sensitive personal information or personalized recommendations, advice, or information that could reasonably be relied on for significant personal decisions. For other consumer transactions, disclosure is required when the consumer clearly and unambiguously asks whether they are interacting with generative AI. The statute includes rules about when and how the disclosure appears and a safe harbor tied to disclosure by the AI system itself. The exact terms, definitions, and exceptions matter. A business cannot avoid consumer-protection responsibility by blaming generative AI. The Division of Consumer Protection enforces the law and may impose statutory penalties. Separately, Utah’s Office of AI Policy operates the learning laboratory, which can provide a structured route for studying AI policy and negotiating regulatory mitigation agreements for participants under stated conditions. The program does not exempt participants from every law. Utah’s model is narrower than a broad risk-management statute. It uses disclosure and existing consumer-protection mechanisms, while the learning laboratory supports experimentation. Product teams should check current Utah Code Chapter 75, the amended definitions, the regulated-professional status, interaction risk, disclosure placement, and any applicable consumer-protection duties. Since the 2025 law sets a sunset date for Chapter 72, future renewal or replacement legislation could change the framework again.
Kesan Strategik
Risiko dan keselamatan
Kemudaratan AI malapetaka dan setiap hari bergantung pada siapa yang memahami risiko dan siapa yang boleh bertindak.
Keputusan yang lebih jelas
Celik awam dan profesional membentuk sama ada dasar keselamatan yang kukuh adalah mungkin dari segi politik.
Memotong keterujaan
Penjelasan yang jelas mengurangkan tangkapan oleh gembar-gembur, PR makmal dan teater etika yang tidak jelas.
The Future of Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act
Utah’s disclosure framework is active under the 2025 amendments, while the chapter’s scheduled sunset makes legislative updates especially relevant. Agency materials and enforcement may clarify edge cases, and lawmakers may extend or replace the provisions. Recheck the Utah Code and official legislative history before relying on older SB 149 summaries or designing a long-term compliance control. Assign an owner to monitor Utah legislative sessions and agency notices. Revalidate controls before the scheduled sunset. Keep a copy of the current code.
Pelaksanaan Dunia Sebenar
A Utah licensed professional identifies whether a generative-AI interaction collects sensitive information or provides personalized advice that makes it high risk under the amended law.
A retailer configures a clear response when a consumer directly and unambiguously asks whether the service is generative AI.
A product team uses a system-level notice so disclosure does not depend on the model spontaneously mentioning itself.
A startup asks the Office of AI Policy about the learning laboratory’s current application, safeguards, and mitigation-agreement conditions before joining.
Risiko & Pengawal
Merawat risiko kewujudan sebagai sci-fi manakala sebatian keupayaan.
Mengelirukan keselamatan produk permukaan dengan penjajaran di bawah autonomi tinggi.
Meninggalkan khalayak bukan Inggeris dan bukan pakar dengan hanya sumber berkualiti rendah.
Hala Tuju Pelaksanaan
Asingkan bahaya produk, penyalahgunaan dan kehilangan kawalan / risiko salah jajaran.
Tanya apakah bukti yang akan mengubah pandangan anda tentang garis masa dan keterukan.
Lebih suka sumber utama dan penilaian konkrit berbanding tuntutan pemasaran.
Kenal pasti satu laluan tindakan: kerjaya, dasar, pembiayaan atau kemahiran — bukan sahaja kesedaran.
Teruskan Meneroka
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
Soalan lazim
What is Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act?
Utah’s 2024 Artificial Intelligence Policy Act created disclosure duties for generative AI in specified regulated-professional and consumer contexts, alongside an Office of AI Policy and learning laboratory. A 2025 law amended the disclosure framework effective May 7, 2025 and extended the chapter’s sunset to July 1, 2027. The current statutory text should guide any compliance decision.
When did the relevant SB 226 amendments take effect?
The enrolled SB 226 identifies May 7, 2025 as the effective date for the amendments.
After the 2025 amendments, which interaction can trigger proactive disclosure by a regulated professional?
The amended law focuses proactive disclosure duties for regulated occupations on high-risk interactions defined in statute.
For other consumer transactions, what can trigger the disclosure duty?
The amended law requires disclosure in other consumer transactions when a consumer clearly and unambiguously asks.
Can a Utah business avoid a consumer-protection violation by blaming the AI output?
Utah law does not let a business avoid consumer-protection responsibility merely because AI generated the statement or action.
Which purpose does Utah’s learning laboratory serve?
The Office of AI Policy and learning laboratory support policy study and conditional mitigation arrangements.
Teruskan belajar
Panduan berkaitan
Lebih banyak panduan dipilih untuk topik ini