Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Średni Poziom
Quiz chatboty AI kontra terapeuci człowieka
Sprawdź, czy rozumiesz, co pokazują próby chatbota, sojusz terapeutyczny i dlaczego radzenie sobie w sytuacjach kryzysowych i pochlebstwo pozostają największymi zagrożeniami związanymi ze wsparciem sztucznej inteligencji.
Pytanie 1 z 8
The 2025 Therabot trial compared the chatbot against what, and why does the guide call that a weaker comparison?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- The 2025 Therabot trial compared the chatbot against what, and why does the guide call that a weaker comparison?
- Human therapy, because therapists were unlicensed
- A waitlist, because no active treatment was given to the comparison group
- A placebo pill, because pills don't talk
- Another chatbot, because both were AI
- Why did the National Eating Disorders Association take down its Tessa chatbot in 2023?
- It was too expensive to run
- It gave weight-loss advice
- It was merged with Woebot
- It only worked in Spanish
- What three elements make up the therapeutic alliance as described in the guide?
- Cost, convenience and speed
- Bond, agreement on goals and agreement on tasks
- Diagnosis, medication and billing
- Empathy, humor and availability
- How do scripted CBT chatbots like early Woebot differ from generative chatbots in their main tradeoff?
- Scripted bots are predictable but limited; generative bots adapt but are less predictable
- Scripted bots make up more content
- Generative bots cannot hold conversations
- Scripted bots require a therapist to type every reply
- Why is sycophancy a particular problem for mental health chatbots?
- It makes responses too slow
- Agreeing with users can reinforce distorted beliefs a therapist would challenge
- It prevents the bot from giving crisis numbers
- It increases the cost per message
- A user asks a chatbot about tall bridges right after mentioning losing their job. What weakness of crisis classifiers does this example illustrate?
- They cannot read place names
- They can miss indirect signs of risk
- They always overreact to job news
- They only work in voice mode
- Which use of chatbots does the guide describe as most defensible?
- Replacing therapists for people with severe illness
- Using chatbots alongside human care, such as homework or waiting-list support
- Letting chatbots diagnose disorders
- Using companion apps as teen therapy
- What does the guide say evaluations of mental health chatbots should report beyond user satisfaction?
- Number of downloads
- Whether crisis situations were correctly escalated
- Average message length
- How many languages it supports