Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Średni Poziom

Quiz dotyczący sztucznej inteligencji w zarządzaniu cyklem życia umowy

Testuje CLM po podpisaniu: ekstrakcję metadanych, powiadomienia o odnowieniu i terminie wypowiedzenia, rodziny umów ze zmianami i dokładność na poziomie pola.

Powiązane ścieżki prowadząceZarządzanie cyklem życia kontraktu AI
Pytanie 1 z 8

An auto-renewing contract must be cancelled 60 days before its term ends. Why must the alert fire well before the renewal date?

Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania

Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.

  1. An auto-renewing contract must be cancelled 60 days before its term ends. Why must the alert fire well before the renewal date?
    • Because renewal dates are always wrong in the contract text
    • Because the deadline that matters is the notice deadline 60 days before term end, not the renewal date
    • Because CLM systems can only send alerts once a year
    • Because the vendor must approve the cancellation in advance
  2. Why should a CLM extraction pipeline keep the exact source text for each extracted value?
    • So that a reviewer can confirm the field quickly and the value can be audited
    • So that the contract can be translated automatically
    • So that the model uses less memory
    • So that duplicate contracts are deleted
  3. According to the guide, why should notice deadlines be computed in ordinary code instead of by the language model?
    • Language models cannot read dates at all
    • Code can read scanned PDFs better than models
    • Date arithmetic, business-day rules and time zones are where language models make quiet errors
    • Contracts never state their term length
  4. A master agreement has three later amendments. How should a CLM system decide which terms are in force?
    • Use only the master agreement, since amendments are informal
    • Average the terms across all documents
    • Use whichever document has the most pages
    • Link the family and apply the latest valid document's terms
  5. Why does the guide recommend measuring extraction accuracy field by field?
    • A system can be excellent at party names and weak at exceptions to liability caps
    • Vendors only report accuracy for one field
    • Every field is always equally hard to extract
    • Field-level measurement is required by law
  6. What does obligation tracking turn clauses such as reporting duties or audit rights into?
    • Signature requests
    • Tasks with owners and due dates
    • Marketing summaries
    • New contract templates
  7. Even with excellent extraction, which contractual commitments stay invisible to a CLM system?
    • Clauses written in formal legal language
    • Governing law provisions
    • Side letters and agreements made by email that never reach the repository
    • Payment terms in scanned PDFs
  8. How does the guide say low-confidence extracted values should be handled?
    • Discarded automatically
    • Accepted as correct to save time
    • Replaced with the most common value in the collection
    • Routed to human review