Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Ciężko Poziom
Sztuczna inteligencja w sądach i quiz oceny ryzyka sądowego
Testuje, jak działają przedprocesowe oceny ryzyka, co ujawniła debata COMPAS i ProPublica oraz dlaczego kalibracja i równe poziomy błędów mogą być ze sobą sprzeczne.
Pytanie 1 z 8
What does the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) produce?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- What does the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) produce?
- A single guilt probability for use at trial
- A recommended prison sentence in months
- Separate scores for failure to appear and new criminal activity, plus a flag for new violent criminal activity
- A psychological profile based on a long interview
- What did ProPublica's 2016 analysis of COMPAS in Broward County report?
- Black defendants who did not reoffend were nearly twice as likely as white defendants to be labeled higher risk
- COMPAS scores were identical for all defendants
- White defendants were more often labeled high risk and then did not reoffend
- COMPAS predicted reoffending perfectly
- How did Northpointe respond to ProPublica's findings?
- It withdrew COMPAS from the market
- It admitted the tool was intentionally biased
- It said race was the most important input
- It argued the scores were equally predictive: a given score matched similar reoffense rates across races
- Why can a risk score generally not be calibrated and have equal false positive and false negative rates across groups at the same time?
- Because the models are too small
- Because the groups have different underlying base rates of the outcome
- Because judges refuse to use calibrated tools
- Because ROC curves cannot be computed for criminal data
- What did the Wisconsin Supreme Court decide in State v. Loomis (2016)?
- COMPAS scores are banned in all sentencing
- Defendants must be shown COMPAS source code
- A judge may consider a COMPAS score with warnings about its limits, but it cannot be the deciding factor
- Risk scores must replace judicial discretion
- What is 'label bias' in pretrial risk tools?
- Rearrest, the outcome being predicted, reflects police contact rather than actual offending
- Defendants are given inaccurate name labels in the database
- Scores are printed in colors that bias judges
- Labels are assigned randomly during training
- What does the area under the ROC curve (AUC) measure for a risk tool?
- Whether scores mean the same thing across racial groups
- How many defendants a court processes per day
- The legal validity of the tool under due process
- How well the scores rank people who later fail above those who do not
- According to the guide, which statement about most judicial risk assessment tools is accurate?
- They are advanced deep learning systems that read case files
- They are mostly transparent statistical models that use only a handful of factors
- They make final bail decisions without a judge
- They are only used in federal courts