Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Ciężko Poziom
Quiz dotyczący przewidywania ryzyka samobójstwa
Testuje problem stawki podstawowej związany z niską dodatnią wartością predykcyjną, progami opartymi na możliwościach i etycznym zasięgiem bez przymusu po oznaczeniu ryzyka.
Pytanie 1 z 8
A model with 90 percent sensitivity and specificity is applied where 100 of 100,000 patients attempt suicide. Roughly what share of flagged patients will actually attempt?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- A model with 90 percent sensitivity and specificity is applied where 100 of 100,000 patients attempt suicide. Roughly what share of flagged patients will actually attempt?
- About 90 percent
- Około 50 proc
- Under 1 percent
- About 10 percent
- According to the guide, what are suicide risk models best understood as?
- Tools that identify who will die by suicide
- Tools for prioritizing limited clinical attention
- Replacements for clinical assessment
- Legal evidence for involuntary commitment
- Roughly what share of risk scores does the VA's REACH VET program flag for review?
- The top 50 percent
- The top 10 percent
- The top 0.1 percent
- Every veteran with a mental health diagnosis
- Why do health systems often set flagging thresholds by capacity?
- So they flag only as many patients as staff can meaningfully contact
- Because regulators require exactly 100 flags per month
- To maximize the number of false positives
- Because the models cannot produce scores below a set value
- Which response to a risk flag fits the ethical practice described in the guide?
- Sharing the flag with the patient's employer
- Voluntary outreach, safety planning and discussing safe storage of lethal means
- Automatically canceling the patient's firearm license
- Not telling the patient or clinician anything
- What does calibration mean for a suicide risk model?
- Jak szybko działa model
- Whether predicted risk levels match observed rates, such as a 2 percent prediction corresponding to about 2 percent observed
- Whether the model ranks patients in order
- How many variables the model uses
- Why do these models need periodic revalidation?
- Changes in coding practice, screening workflows or care patterns can quietly degrade performance
- Software licenses expire yearly
- Patients' names change
- Revalidation increases the base rate of suicide
- Which kind of evidence does the guide describe as strongest for these programs?
- High retrospective accuracy on historical records
- Materiały marketingowe dostawcy
- Prospective evaluation showing that flag-triggered outreach reduces attempts
- A large number of input variables