Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Średni Poziom

Inwentaryzacja sztucznej inteligencji i patentów: quiz dotyczący przypadków DABUS

Testuje orzeczenia DABUS w USA, Wielkiej Brytanii, Europie i Australii, zasadę wynalazcy będącego osobą fizyczną oraz standardy USPTO dotyczące wynalazczości wspomaganej sztuczną inteligencją.

Powiązane ścieżki prowadząceInwentarz patentów AI Dabus
Pytanie 1 z 8

Which two inventions did Stephen Thaler say DABUS created on its own?

Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania

Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.

  1. Which two inventions did Stephen Thaler say DABUS created on its own?
    • A self-driving delivery robot and a battery cooling system
    • A food container with a fractal surface and a flashing emergency light
    • A cancer drug molecule and a protein-folding method
    • A solar panel coating and a water filtration membrane
  2. What did the US Federal Circuit decide in Thaler v. Vidal (2022)?
    • AI-assisted inventions can never be patented
    • Thaler should be named inventor in place of DABUS
    • The word "individuals" in the Patent Act means natural persons
    • The USPTO must create a new category for AI inventors
  3. What did the UK Supreme Court rule in December 2023?
    • An inventor under the Patents Act 1977 must be a natural person
    • DABUS could be named inventor if Thaler co-signed
    • UK patents may name AI as inventor for software inventions
    • The case should be sent to the European Patent Office
  4. Why does South Africa's 2021 DABUS patent carry little legal weight?
    • It was revoked within a week
    • It named Thaler rather than DABUS
    • It covered only design rights, not inventions
    • South Africa does not substantively examine patent applications
  5. How did the DABUS litigation go in Australia?
    • The High Court ruled that AI can be an inventor
    • Australia never received a DABUS application
    • A single judge accepted DABUS in 2021, and the Full Federal Court reversed that in 2022
    • The patent office granted the patent without any court case
  6. Which statement about AI-assisted inventions is accurate according to this guide?
    • Any use of AI in research makes an invention unpatentable
    • They can be patented when a human makes a significant contribution to the invention
    • They can be patented only in South Africa
    • They must name the AI as a co-inventor alongside humans
  7. Under the USPTO's February 2024 guidance, which activity could count as a significant human contribution?
    • Owning the AI system that produced the invention
    • Supervising the computer the AI runs on
    • Presenting a general problem to the AI
    • Writing a prompt designed to produce a specific solution
  8. Why should teams keep dated records of prompts, outputs and human decisions?
    • Errors in naming inventors can make a patent invalid or unenforceable
    • The law requires AI outputs to be published before filing
    • Records let the AI be named as inventor later
    • Patent offices charge lower fees when records are attached