Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Średni Poziom
Quiz sprawdzający najemców AI
Testuje, w jaki sposób budowane są wyniki badań przesiewowych, dlaczego dane dotyczące dopasowywania tylko nazwisk i eksmisji polegające wyłącznie na składaniu dokumentów powodują błędy oraz czego wymagają powiadomienia o działaniach niepożądanych FCRA.
Pytanie 1 z 8
Why does reporting an eviction filing without its outcome mislead a landlord?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- Why does reporting an eviction filing without its outcome mislead a landlord?
- Filings are always sealed after 30 days
- A dismissed or settled case looks the same as a judgment against the tenant
- Filings contain the tenant's full credit history
- Only criminal courts record eviction outcomes
- A screening report attaches a stranger's conviction to an applicant who shares his name. Which vendor practice most likely caused this?
- Using a 0-1000 score scale
- Pulling data from sex offender registries
- Matching court records on name alone without strong identifiers like full date of birth
- Reinvestigating disputes within 30 days
- A landlord relies entirely on a vendor's decline recommendation. Who owes the applicant an adverse action notice under the FCRA?
- The landlord, who made the decision to deny
- Nobody, because the vendor's algorithm decided
- Only the credit bureau that supplied the data
- The local housing court
- Which item must an FCRA adverse action notice to a rental applicant include?
- The landlord's full scoring formula
- A list of other applicants who were approved
- The applicant's right to a free copy of the report within 60 days and the right to dispute it
- A statement that the vendor made the final decision
- How can a screening model produce disparate impact without using race as an input?
- By running on a cloud server
- By weighting factors like criminal records or credit history that fall unevenly across racial groups
- By using a numeric score instead of a letter grade
- By returning results in under a minute
- What was the 2024 SafeRent Solutions settlement in Massachusetts about?
- Selling tenant data to advertisers
- Failing to verify landlords' identities
- Charging applicants duplicate application fees
- Claims that its score disproportionately harmed Black and Hispanic applicants using housing vouchers
- Why is a credit-heavy score a weak guide for an applicant with a housing voucher?
- Voucher holders have no credit files
- A housing authority pays much of the rent, so personal credit says less about whether rent gets paid
- Vouchers make FCRA not apply
- Credit scores are illegal in rental housing
- Under the FCRA, what is generally true of adverse items other than convictions?
- They can be reported forever
- They must be reported for at least ten years
- They generally cannot be reported once they are more than seven years old
- They are only reportable in the applicant's home state