Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Ciężko Poziom
Objaśnienie quizu dotyczącego ustawy Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205).
Testuje, jak ustawa Colorado AI Act definiuje systemy wysokiego ryzyka i dyskryminację algorytmiczną, obowiązki programistów i wdrażających oraz ich egzekwowanie i opóźnienia.
Pytanie 1 z 8
Under SB 24-205, what makes an AI system high-risk?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- Under SB 24-205, what makes an AI system high-risk?
- It uses more than a set amount of computing power
- It is sold to government agencies
- It makes, or is a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision
- It generates images or video
- To what date did the August 2025 special session delay the law's effective date?
- June 30, 2026
- February 1, 2026
- 1 stycznia 2025 r
- December 31, 2027
- Who enforces the Colorado AI Act?
- Any consumer through a private lawsuit
- The Federal Trade Commission
- The Colorado Attorney General exclusively
- Each county court
- Which is a deployer duty rather than a developer duty?
- Providing documentation on training data to customers
- Publishing a summary of high-risk systems the company develops
- Reporting discovered discrimination risks to deployers who use its system
- Completing impact assessments and notifying consumers about AI use in decisions
- What must happen after an adverse consequential decision made with a high-risk system?
- The consumer receives an automatic refund
- The consumer receives the principal reasons, a chance to correct data and an appeal where feasible
- The system must be shut down
- The developer must publish the consumer's file
- Following which framework can support an affirmative defense under the law?
- The NIST AI Risk Management Framework
- Ustawa Sarbanesa-Oxleya
- The General Data Protection Regulation
- The Americans with Disabilities Act
- How does the Colorado law mainly differ from the EU AI Act?
- It covers every AI system with equal obligations
- It bans more AI practices than the EU law
- It focuses on algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions rather than banned practices and conformity assessments
- It applies only to AI developed outside the US
- Within how many days must a developer report discovered discrimination risks to the Attorney General and known deployers?
- 10 days
- 30 days
- 365 days
- 90 days