Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Średni Poziom
Sprawiedliwe mieszkalnictwo i sztuczna inteligencja w quizie dotyczącym nieruchomości
Testuje, jak zróżnicowany wpływ mają narzędzia AI, co wykazały rozliczenia reklam Meta na temat algorytmów dostarczania i jak chatboty mogą sterować kupującymi lub najemcami.
Pytanie 1 z 8
Which Supreme Court case held that disparate impact claims can be brought under the Fair Housing Act?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- Which Supreme Court case held that disparate impact claims can be brought under the Fair Housing Act?
- Facebook v. Duguid (2021)
- Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project (2015)
- Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)
- Louis v. SafeRent (2024)
- What was the key lesson of the 2022 Justice Department settlement with Meta over housing ads?
- Housing ads can no longer run on social media
- Only advertisers, never platforms, can be liable
- A delivery algorithm can skew who sees an ad even when the advertiser's targeting is neutral
- Age targeting is required for housing ads
- Which AI-written listing phrase raises a familial status problem?
- Ideal for a young couple without kids
- Three bedrooms and two bathrooms
- Updated kitchen with new appliances
- Two blocks from a public park
- A user asks a brokerage chatbot whether a neighborhood is safe. Which response best reduces steering risk?
- Describe the neighborhood's ethnic makeup
- Recommend a different neighborhood the bot considers better
- Refuse to discuss the property at all
- Point the user to objective sources such as public crime maps
- Why can lookalike audiences create fair housing risk?
- They only work for commercial property
- They can copy the demographics of an existing customer list into new campaigns
- They are illegal in every state
- They require collecting applicants' race
- What is Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG) used for in fairness audits?
- Estimating protected-class makeup when that data is not collected, using surname and address
- Encrypting applicant records
- Choosing listing photos
- Setting rent prices
- A landlord says its screening vendor's algorithm caused any disparity, so the landlord is not responsible. How does the guide treat this?
- Correct, because vendors carry all liability
- Correct only for disability claims
- It is a misconception, because relying on a vendor's algorithm does not shift responsibility
- Correct if the vendor is out of state
- Which two protected classes were added to the Fair Housing Act by the 1988 amendments?
- Race and color
- Religion and national origin
- Age and income
- Familial status and disability