Quiz połączony z przewodnikiem · Średni Poziom
Australijski automatyczny quiz dotyczący skandalów zadłużeniowych firmy Robodebt
Testuje, jak działało uśrednianie dochodów Robodebta, dlaczego było to niezgodne z prawem, przesunięcie ciężaru dowodu, a także Komisja Królewska i wyniki rozliczeń.
Pytanie 1 z 8
What was the central calculation method that made Robodebt debts unreliable?
Podgląd każdego pytania8 pytania
Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.
- What was the central calculation method that made Robodebt debts unreliable?
- Using bank transaction records to estimate spending
- Averaging annual tax office income evenly across fortnights
- Predicting future income with a machine learning model
- Counting the number of employers a person had worked for
- Why does averaging income cause errors for many welfare recipients?
- Their income is often irregular or seasonal
- Tax office data is usually fabricated
- Centrelink does not require income reporting
- Averaging always overstates income by exactly half
- How did Robodebt change who had to prove the correct income?
- The tax office had to verify each debt with employers
- Courts reviewed every debt before it was issued
- Recipients had to supply records to disprove the averaged figure
- Private debt collectors calculated the final amount
- What did the Federal Court's orders in the 2019 Amato case recognise?
- That data matching between agencies is always illegal
- That Centrelink must stop paying benefits fortnightly
- That the scheme was lawful but poorly communicated
- That a debt based on income averaging was not validly raised
- Roughly what was the reported total value of the class action settlement?
- About A$1.8 billion
- About A$18 million
- About A$180 billion
- No money was involved; only an apology
- Who led the Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme?
- A panel of tax office officials
- Catherine Holmes
- The Federal Court judge in the Amato case
- An international UN rapporteur
- According to the guide, what is a common misconception about Robodebt?
- That it affected welfare recipients
- That it involved data from the tax office
- That it was mainly a software bug
- That it was eventually stopped
- What step did the earlier human-run process include that the automated version effectively removed?
- Sending letters by post
- Recording income by financial year
- Paying benefits fortnightly
- Using the data match only as a trigger for verification with employers