Questionário vinculado ao guia · Difícil Nível

Questionário de alinhamento de IA

Teste hacking de recompensas, limites RLHF, jogos de especificações, consciência de avaliação e como a supervisão escalonável ajuda em tarefas difíceis de verificar.

Caminhos de guia relacionadosAlinhamento de IA
Pergunta 1 de 8

In alignment research, what does the term "reward hacking" describe?

Visualize cada pergunta8 perguntas

As respostas e explicações aparecem conforme você responde ao teste.

  1. In alignment research, what does the term "reward hacking" describe?
    • A model refusing to optimize its reward because the task seems harmful
    • An agent exploiting flaws in its reward signal instead of doing the intended task
    • An attacker stealing the reward model's weights to retrain a competing system
    • Developers manually raising reward values to speed up convergence during training
  2. In RLHF, what is the role of the reward model?
    • It replaces human raters entirely by writing the reference answers for fine-tuning
    • It stores a fixed list of banned words that the policy is never allowed to output
    • It generates new pretraining text so the base model has more data to learn from
    • It learns from human preference comparisons and scores outputs to guide the policy
  3. What does goal misspecification mean in the guide?
    • A model behaves differently when it recognizes a test setting
    • The written objective fails to represent what people actually intend
    • An agent finds a shortcut in a proxy metric while optimizing it
    • A model refuses every task after a safety update
  4. Which description matches instrumental convergence in the guide?
    • A user changes their prompt after a refusal
    • A system may seek power or resources because they help achieve many possible goals
    • A test set is held out from training
    • A reward model stores written principles
  5. Which modern alignment approach is named in the guide?
    • Credit scoring notices
    • Post-market incident reporting
    • Dataset deduplication
    • IA Constitucional
  6. What does "scalable oversight" research try to solve?
    • How to reduce the number of parameters while keeping accuracy constant
    • How humans can supervise AI on tasks too hard for them to evaluate directly
    • How to serve a model to millions of users at once without increasing latency
    • How to scale training clusters across multiple data centers efficiently
  7. Why does preference optimization not prove that a model has adopted human intent as an internal goal?
    • It improves average responses but does not prove stable behavior under shift or pressure
    • It prevents models from using human preference data
    • It guarantees a model will ignore every written instruction
    • It measures only GPU efficiency
  8. Why might an alignment evaluation include tests for evaluation awareness?
    • To measure the number of human raters in training
    • To determine whether a reward model has enough parameters
    • To see whether a model changes behavior when it recognizes a test setting
    • To prove that a system is conscious