Bài kiểm tra có liên kết hướng dẫn · Trung bình Cấp độ

AI trong bài kiểm tra bảo hiểm

Kiểm tra trách nhiệm giải trình trong quyết định, rủi ro ủy nhiệm, kháng cáo, yêu cầu áp dụng, kết quả của nhóm, hồ sơ và quyền truy đòi của chủ hợp đồng.

Đường dẫn hướng dẫn liên quanBảo hiểm AI
Câu hỏi 1 của 8

Why is a predictive score not a complete underwriting decision?

Xem trước mọi câu hỏi8 câu hỏi

Câu trả lời và giải thích xuất hiện khi bạn làm bài kiểm tra.

  1. Why is a predictive score not a complete underwriting decision?
    • It does not by itself establish fair use, lawful relevance, explanation, or review
    • A score cannot rank records
    • Every insurer uses identical data
    • Only human decisions can be measured
  2. A claims model reduces payments but appeals rise. What should the insurer investigate?
    • Whether the model’s name changed
    • Whether more images were stored
    • Whether the benchmark score improved
    • Whether wrongful denials or delays increased, not just the payment total
  3. What should be checked before using third-party or credit-related features?
    • Only the feature’s predictive strength
    • Whether the field is numeric
    • Permitted use, provenance, and whether the feature acts as an irrelevant or protected proxy
    • If the vendor provides a dashboard
  4. Why monitor appeals, overrides, and complaints after deployment?
    • They prove the score is accurate
    • They can reveal errors or harms not visible in model metrics
    • They replace group outcome analysis
    • They are unrelated to customer outcomes
  5. What does the NAIC Model Bulletin imply about insurer AI-supported decisions?
    • The bulletin approves all insurer models
    • A model removes the need for governance
    • All state requirements are identical
    • They remain subject to applicable insurance laws, including unfair discrimination rules
  6. Which record helps explain an AI-supported claim outcome?
    • Model version, vendor data, reasons, human review, and corrective action
    • Only the final payment amount
    • Số tham số của mô hình
    • A copy of the customer’s unrelated policies
  7. Why evaluate across relevant claim conditions and groups?
    • A single average guarantees fairness
    • Errors can vary by claimant or claim context despite acceptable overall accuracy
    • Different conditions cannot affect model error
    • Group checks replace case review
  8. What should a policyholder be able to do where required?
    • Change the model’s training data directly
    • Access other customers’ claims
    • Ask questions about and challenge an outcome through an appropriate path
    • Approve the insurer’s vendor