在本页3 分钟阅读
概述
The required route depends on whether the system falls under Annex III or is safety-related AI in regulated products, and on applicable standards, common specifications and product legislation.
深入探讨
Conformity assessment is the process of demonstrating that a high-risk AI system meets the Act’s requirements. The provider is responsible for classifying, documenting and assessing the system before placing it on the market or putting it into service. The AI Act does not require CE marking for all AI tools; the duties discussed here attach to high-risk AI systems, which may also be subject to other EU product rules. For Annex III point 1, Article 43 allows internal control or notified-body assessment when relevant standards or common specifications are applied. Annex VII is required if neither standards exist nor common specifications are available; the standard is not applied or only partly applied; available specifications are not applied; or an applied standard has a restriction, only for that restricted part. Points 2–8 use Annex VI internal control. For Annex I products, Article 43(3) integrates Section 2 and Article 17 quality-management requirements into the sector procedure. A sectoral no-third-party option conditioned on standards covering all sector requirements is allowed only if standards or Article 41 common specifications also cover all Section 2 requirements. After assessment, the provider draws up an EU declaration of conformity, assumes responsibility for conformity, and affixes CE marking visibly and indelibly, or to packaging or documentation if the system’s nature makes that appropriate. Digitally provided systems may use a digital mark if readily accessible. A notified-body identification number accompanies the CE mark when applicable. The CE mark signals conformity with applicable requirements; it is not a quality award or general guarantee. Substantial modifications can trigger a new assessment, while predetermined changes documented in the original assessment are treated differently.
战略影响
风险与安全
灾难性和日常的人工智能危害都取决于谁了解风险以及谁能够采取行动。
更清晰的判决
公众和专业素养决定强有力的安全政策在政治上是否可行。
打破炒作
清晰的解释可以减少炒作、实验室公关和模糊道德剧场的影响。
The Future of EU AI Act Conformity Assessment and CE Marking
The legal framework anticipates harmonised standards, common specifications and notified bodies as parts of implementation, and Regulation 2026/1744 extended high-risk application dates. Technical standards and designation details may change, so providers should verify official Commission and EUR-Lex publications when selecting a route. Voluntary standards assist compliance but do not replace the regulation. Providers should monitor Commission publications on standards and conformity procedures before each launch. A change to intended purpose or system design can affect both classification and assessment, so maintain a controlled change log.
现实世界的实施
A provider classifies an Annex III system, completes the applicable conformity route, signs the EU declaration of conformity and affixes CE marking before market placement.
An Annex III point 1 system uses harmonised standards and chooses internal control or the specified notified-body route as the Act permits.
A high-risk system in an Annex I regulated product follows that sector’s conformity procedure with AI Act requirements integrated.
A software provider checks whether a digital CE mark is easily accessible from the system interface or through a machine-readable means.
风险与防护栏
将存在风险视为科幻小说,同时能力复合。
混淆了表面产品安全与高度自治下的对准。
只给非英语和非专业观众留下低质量的资源。
实施路线图
单独的产品危害、误用和失控/失调风险。
询问哪些证据会改变您对时间表和严重性的看法。
比起营销主张,更喜欢主要来源和具体评估。
确定一条行动路径:职业、政策、资金或技能——而不仅仅是意识。
不断探索
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the EU AI Act Conformity Assessment and CE Marking quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
常见问题
What is EU AI Act Conformity Assessment and CE Marking?
The AI Act’s conformity-assessment and CE-marking duties concern high-risk AI systems, not every AI product. The required route depends on whether the system falls under Annex III or is safety-related AI in regulated products, and on applicable standards, common specifications and product legislation.
Which AI systems are the subject of the Act’s high-risk CE-marking obligations?
The conformity and CE provisions apply to high-risk AI systems, not every AI tool.
For Annex III points 2–8, which conformity route does Article 43 specify?
Article 43(2) specifies internal control for these categories.
When can Annex III point 1 providers choose between internal control and notified-body assessment?
Article 43(1) permits the choice where standards or common specifications have been applied.
When neither relevant harmonised standards nor common specifications are available, or a provider only partly applies a relevant harmonised standard, what route applies?
Article 43(1)(a) and (b) require Annex VII when both standards and common specifications are unavailable, or when a provider has not applied or has applied only part of a relevant harmonised standard.
How does conformity work for an AI system embedded in an Annex I regulated product?
Article 43(3) applies the sectoral conformity route and integrates the AI Act requirements.
继续学习
相关指南
为此主题精选的更多指南