Co nauczyciele powinni zrobić, gdy podejrzewają niewłaściwe użycie sztucznej inteligencji – quiz

Odpowiedzi i wyjaśnienia pojawiają się w miarę rozwiązywania quizu.

1. Co powinien zrobić nauczyciel w pierwszej kolejności, gdy podejrzewa niewłaściwe wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji?
   • Assign a zero immediately
   • Gather concrete evidence such as earlier work, citations and version history
   • Announce the suspicion to the class
   • Rely on a detector score to decide
2. Co jest określane jako jeden z najbardziej konkretnych objawów nieedytowanych wyników chatbota?
   • Long paragraphs
   • Use of the passive voice
   • Fabricated references to sources that do not exist
   • Correct spelling throughout
3. Jak przewodnik zaleca rozpoczęcie rozmowy z uczniem?
   • With curiosity, asking them to walk through how they wrote the work
   • By stating 'I know you used ChatGPT'
   • By showing them the detector score first
   • By asking them to sign a confession
4. Jak należy traktować wynik detektora AI?
   • As proof strong enough for a formal penalty
   • As irrelevant and never mentioned
   • As more reliable than version history
   • As a weak signal at most
5. Który czynnik jest istotny przy wyborze proporcjonalnej konsekwencji?
   • Whether the student is popular
   • Whether the assignment's AI rules were clear
   • How long the teacher has worked at the school
   • The student's handwriting
6. What should documentation of an incident include?
   • Opinions about the student's character
   • Only the final grade
   • Dates, observations, questions asked, the student's answers and the outcome
   • A copy of the student's social media
7. Why might an informal side deal be a problem at some institutions?
   • It can conflict with a policy that requires reporting and may leave students without appeal rights
   • It is always faster than a formal process
   • It prevents students from redoing the work
   • It requires a detector score
8. Why does the guide stress applying the same checks to every student?
   • To save grading time
   • Because detectors require it
   • So that only strong writers are reviewed
   • To avoid singling out students because of writing style or language background