Awọn ile-iṣẹ Itọsọna

Glean

Glean is a Palo Alto company, founded in 2019, that sells AI search, a chat assistant and agent tools built on a permission-aware index of a company's own apps.

Gbọ si itọsọna yiiAI-ṣe afihan · ~8 min

Lori iwe yi9 min kika
  1. Akopọ
  2. Awọn gbigba bọtini
  3. Jin Dive
  4. Tracing one permission-aware answer
  5. Real-World imuse
  6. Ojo iwaju ti Glean
  7. Fifi o sinu iwa
  8. Awọn orisun ati siwaju kika
  9. Tesiwaju Ṣiṣawari
  10. Awọn ibeere ti a beere nigbagbogbo

Akopọ

It matters because it shows the main pattern for workplace AI: retrieve the documents an employee is allowed to see, then have a language model answer from them with citations.

Awọn gbigba bọtini

  1. Glean was founded in 2019 in Palo Alto and sells enterprise search, Glean Assistant and the Glean Agents platform.
  2. Its connectors copy each app's content, metadata and access control lists so results only include items the user can already open.
  3. Glean Assistant uses retrieval-augmented generation, answering from retrieved documents and citing them instead of relying on a fine-tuned model.
  4. Glean was valued at $7.2 billion after a $150 million Series F in June 2025.
  5. Fortune reported in December 2025 that Glean reached $200 million in annual recurring revenue, double the figure from nine months earlier.

Jin Dive

Glean is an enterprise software company that makes the information scattered across a company's apps searchable and answerable in one place. It was founded in 2019 in Palo Alto, California, by Arvind Jain, who is its CEO, with Piyush Prahladka, Tony Gentilcore and T.R. Vishwanath. Its products are Glean Search, a conversational tool called Glean Assistant, and Glean Agents, a platform for building and running AI agents, meaning software that carries out multi-step tasks rather than only answering a question. All three sit on the same foundation: an index of the customer's own documents, messages, tickets and people.

The first step is connection. Glean's documentation describes connectors, small integrations for each app, that sync content and metadata into the customer's search index: titles, bodies, comments, attachments, owners, timestamps and app-specific fields. Connectors also copy each app's access control lists, the records of who may open which item, and fetch people and group data so the same person can be matched across systems. Where an app supports it, they collect activity signals such as views, edits and shares. Sources are kept current with incremental crawls and, in some cases, webhooks or push APIs, while fast-changing sources such as email or calendar can be fetched live at query time instead of being indexed.

The second step is ranking. In a 2023 engineering post, Glean's authors argued that vector search alone, which matches the meaning of a query to the meaning of a document using numeric embeddings, is not enough for workplace content. They described a hybrid approach that combines classic keyword retrieval with neural embeddings, followed by a reranking step that blends dozens of signals, including keyword match, semantic similarity, freshness and personalization, into one relevance score. Personalization comes from what Glean now calls the Enterprise Graph, a knowledge graph whose nodes are content, people and activity, and whose edges include links between documents, people who work together, and who created, edited or shared what.

The third step is generation. Glean Assistant uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): it retrieves the most relevant items the user is allowed to see, passes them to a large language model, and asks the model to answer from that text. The same 2023 post explains why Glean prefers this to fine-tuning, which means further training a model on company data. Fine-tuned knowledge goes stale, cannot respect per-user permissions, cannot point to its sources, and can raise the rate of hallucination, the model stating things that are not true. With RAG, the index can be updated continuously, permissions are enforced before the model sees anything, and the cited documents can be inspected. The post also describes using a language model for query planning, turning one request into several searches, such as GitHub pull requests plus Slack messages.

The company's milestones are well documented. Glean raised a $15 million Series A in March 2019, co-led by Kleiner Perkins and Lightspeed, and launched its search product in September 2021. A $100 million Series C led by Sequoia Capital in May 2022 valued it at $1 billion. Valuations then rose quickly: $2.2 billion in February 2024, $4.6 billion after a Series E of more than $260 million in September 2024, and $7.2 billion after a $150 million Series F led by Wellington Management on June 10, 2025, according to TechCrunch. Glean Agents first appeared in February 2025 and became generally available on May 20, 2025, alongside a model hub giving agents access to 15 large language models through Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI and Azure OpenAI, and a server for the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard for connecting AI agents to tools. On December 8, 2025, Fortune reported that Glean had reached $200 million in annual recurring revenue (ARR), double the $100 million it reported nine months earlier, counting only software subscriptions.

Glean competes in a crowded field. Large productivity suites build assistants that work best on their own content, such as documents and mail stored in one vendor's cloud. Glean's pitch is the opposite: a neutral layer across many vendors' apps. Companies can also build their own RAG systems with open-source vector databases and a model API, which gives full control but leaves them to solve connectors, permission syncing, identity matching and ranking themselves, the parts Glean's documentation spends most of its effort on. The trade-off is cost and dependence on one vendor against the engineering time of building and maintaining the same pipeline in-house.

The limitations follow from the design. Answers can only be as good as what is connected and indexed, so a missing connector or a stale crawl means a missing or outdated answer. Permission mirroring is only as accurate as the source app's own sharing settings: if a sensitive file is shared too widely in the source, it will be searchable for everyone who has access, which is why Glean's documentation tells administrators that opening a result may trigger a second check in the source system and points them to governance tools. Activity signals and available permissions differ by connector. RAG reduces hallucination but does not remove it, so a generated answer can still misread or misstate a correct source, which is why citations matter.

In practice, Glean is sold to organizations rather than individuals. Fortune reported that its contracts run one to three years. Its documentation offers two cloud deployment models. In Glean Hosted, Glean runs a single-tenant instance, isolated from other customers, on Google Cloud. In Customer Hosted, formerly called Cloud-Prem, Glean deploys and operates the instance inside the customer's own Google Cloud or AWS account, and the customer pays the hosting costs. SiliconANGLE reported in May 2025 that a partnership with Dell Technologies also lets enterprises run the platform on their own premises. A rollout typically involves an administrator authorizing each connector, checking that identities and groups map correctly, and testing permission behavior with test accounts before opening the tool to all employees.

04Apẹẹrẹ ṣiṣẹ

Tracing one permission-aware answer

  1. An administrator connects Confluence and Slack; the connectors sync pages, messages, owners and each item's access list into the company's index.

  2. Two employees, one in engineering and one in sales, ask the same question: what is the current release date for the mobile app.

  3. For each employee, the system first removes every indexed item that person cannot open in the source app.

  4. Keyword and embedding retrieval find candidate pages and messages, and ranking boosts recent items and items from people each user works with.

  5. The top results are passed to a language model, which writes an answer and lists the pages and messages it used.

  6. Each employee opens the cited sources to confirm the date and checks whether any restricted engineering channel appeared for the sales user.

Ohun ti o fihan

The two employees may get different answers because they see different source sets, which is the intended behavior. A correct rollout shows no citation that the user could not open directly, and every stated date matches a cited page.

Real-World imuse

Workplace search: an employee types a question once and gets ranked results drawn from connected tools such as Google Drive, Confluence, Jira, Slack, GitHub and Microsoft Teams, filtered to items that person can already open.

Cited answers: Glean Assistant writes a response from retrieved documents and lists the sources it used, so a reader can open the underlying page and check that the answer is grounded.

Support automation: among the more than 30 prebuilt agents Glean offered when Glean Agents became generally available in May 2025 were agents for processing technical support tickets.

Data questions in plain language: a structured query agent announced in May 2025 runs analyses on data stored in Snowflake from natural-language prompts, according to SiliconANGLE's report on the launch.

Regulated deployments: a company that must keep data in its own cloud can choose the Customer Hosted model, in which Glean runs a single-tenant instance inside the customer's own Google Cloud or AWS account.

Ojo iwaju ti Glean

Glean's direction since 2025 has been from search toward agents. The May 2025 release made Glean Agents generally available, added a model hub with 15 language models from three cloud providers, and introduced an MCP server so outside agents can call Glean Search and Assistant. Reporting in 2026 describes the company positioning itself as the layer that connects AI models to enterprise systems and data, rather than primarily as a search box. Several problems remain open for Glean and for enterprise RAG generally. Measuring answer quality inside a private company is hard, because there is no public benchmark of a firm's own documents and questions. Agents that write back to systems such as ticketing tools raise questions about approval, auditing and how to stop an agent whose scope has changed, which Glean addresses with admin controls but which the field has not settled. Permission accuracy depends on how carefully each source app is configured, and oversharing in the source becomes oversharing in search. The competitive picture is also unsettled. Productivity-suite vendors, model companies and in-house teams all offer ways to put a language model on top of company data, and Glean's MCP server is designed to let outside agents draw on its index rather than replace them. How customers split work between a neutral cross-app layer and their main suite's built-in assistant is a question that adoption data, not announcements, will answer.

Fifi o sinu iwa

Kini idi ti o ṣe pataki

  • Ilana olutaja. Awọn maapu opopona olutaja ni ipa kini awọn ẹya ti ẹgbẹ rẹ le kọ ni atẹle.
  • Iye owo ati isuna. Awọn ofin iṣowo ati awọn aṣayan imuṣiṣẹ ni ipa lori idiyele igba pipẹ ati eewu.
  • Ewu ati ailewu. Awọn imoriya ile-iṣẹ ṣe apẹrẹ awọn abawọn ọja, iduro ailewu, ati ṣiṣi.

Ṣọra fun

  • Awọn ikede ifilọlẹ le ju iduroṣinṣin lọ ni awọn iṣan-iṣẹ iṣelọpọ gidi.
  • Ifowoleri API tabi awọn iyipada eto imulo le fọ awọn arosinu ni alẹ.
  • Igbẹkẹle olutaja ẹyọkan ṣe alekun titiipa-inu ati awọn idiyele ijira.

Next awọn igbesẹ

  1. Ṣe ayẹwo awọn olupese nipa lilo awọn iṣẹ ṣiṣe tirẹ ati awọn ipilẹ data.
  2. Ṣe atunyẹwo asiri, aabo, ati awọn ofin ofin ṣaaju iṣọpọ.
  3. Ṣetọju eto ipadabọ kọja awọn awoṣe tabi awọn olutaja.
  4. Bojuto awọn akọsilẹ itusilẹ nitoribẹẹ awọn iyipada maapu oju-ọna ma ṣe iyalẹnu awọn ẹgbẹ.

Awọn orisun ati siwaju kika

  1. TechCrunchEnterprise AI startup Glean lands a $7.2B valuation
  2. FortuneExclusive: Glean hits $200 million ARR, up from $100 million nine months back
  3. SiliconANGLEGlean launches upgraded Glean Agents toolkit and new development tools
  4. GleanHow to build an AI assistant for the enterprise
  5. Glean DocumentationConnectors power Glean
  6. Glean DocumentationGlean deployment models
  7. WikipediaGlean Technologies

Tesiwaju Ṣiṣawari

Ìwé ìròyìn ọfẹ

Gba ìkànìyàn AI ojoojúmọ́

Ìtàn AI mẹta tó jẹ́rìí ní gbogbo owurọ́ ọjọ́ iṣẹ́, kọ́wé ní Gẹ̀ẹ́sì tó rọrùn. Ọfẹ́ fún gbogbo àkókò, kò sí ìpolówó.

Ìmeèlì kan ní gbogbo ọjọ́ iṣẹ́. Yọkúrò ní ìkànìyàn ní ìkànìyàn kan. A kò ta tàbí pín àdírẹ́sì rẹ.

Ṣe idanwo fun ara rẹ

Take the Glean quiz

Ìdáhùn lẹ́sẹ̀kẹsẹ̀ lórí gbogbo ìdáhùn, àti iwe-ẹ̀rí tó lè pin pẹ̀lú ID tó lè jẹ́rìí lẹ́yìn tí o bá kọ́ ẹ̀kọ́.

Bẹrẹ adanwo

Ṣe àtìlẹ́yìn ẹ̀kọ́ AI ọfẹ́. AI Understanding jẹ́ àjọ àìní èrè 501(c)(3) — kò sí ìpolówó, kò sí àkúnya owó, ní gbogbo àkókò. Ṣe ẹbun kan

Awọn ibeere ti a beere nigbagbogbo

Kini Glean?

Glean is a Palo Alto company, founded in 2019, that sells AI search, a chat assistant and agent tools built on a permission-aware index of a company's own apps. It matters because it shows the main pattern for workplace AI: retrieve the documents an employee is allowed to see, then have a language model answer from them with citations.

Iṣoro pataki wo ni Glean ṣe ifọkansi lati yanju fun awọn ile-iṣẹ?

Glean ṣe iṣọkan wiwa kọja awọn irinṣẹ bii Slack, Drive, ati Jira ki awọn oṣiṣẹ le yara wa imọ inu inu tuka.

Kini Glean kọ lati mu awọn ibatan laarin eniyan, awọn iṣẹ akanṣe, ati akoonu?

Glean ṣe agbeka aworan imọ-pato ile-iṣẹ ati atọka wiwa kọja awọn ọna ṣiṣe ti o sopọ.

How does Glean describe permission-aware answers?

Glean documents permission-aware retrieval from connected applications; administrators still need to configure and verify connectors.

Tani o jẹ oludasile bọtini pataki ti Glean, ti o mu iriri iṣaaju wa lati Google ati Rubrik?

Arvind Jain, ẹlẹrọ Google tẹlẹ ati oludasile Rubrik, ṣe iranlọwọ lati rii Glean ni ọdun 2019.

Which retrieval method can supply source passages to a Glean Assistant answer?

Glean describes using retrieval-augmented generation to retrieve permitted source material and produce cited answers. Retrieval can provide grounding, but it cannot guarantee that a response never contains an unsupported claim.