Quiz lié à un guide · Difficile Niveau
Quiz sur la surveillance des modèles d'IA
Teste les signaux de dérive, les étiquettes retardées, les preuves de sous-groupes, le diagnostic de cause, la propriété des alertes, les choix de récupération et les contrôles de suivi.
Question 1 de 8
A feature’s input distribution shifts after a product change. What does this establish?
Prévisualisez chaque question8 des questions
Les réponses et les explications apparaissent au fur et à mesure que vous répondez au quiz.
- A feature’s input distribution shifts after a product change. What does this establish?
- That the model must be retrained immediately
- That the new data are invalid
- A reason to investigate, not automatic proof that accuracy declined
- That task quality improved
- Why track missing fields and invalid ranges before outcome labels arrive?
- They measure accuracy directly
- They replace delayed outcome evaluation
- They prove the model is biased
- They can expose pipeline problems before predictive quality can be measured
- An unlabeled drift metric rises. What is still needed to establish task performance?
- Reliable outcome-based evaluation
- A larger dashboard
- A second drift metric
- A new prompt template
- Why inspect label collection delays and selection?
- Labels always arrive immediately
- Delayed or selective labels can make performance evidence look more complete than it is
- Only model outputs need versioning
- A delayed label is automatically a bad outcome
- A feature definition changed and the model’s inputs shifted. What should happen before retraining?
- Assume all drift requires retraining
- Ignore the shift if latency is stable
- Investigate the cause and determine whether the shift is a data or software defect
- Change the alert threshold until it disappears
- What should a monitoring alert process specify?
- Only a chart color
- The model’s preferred action
- A guarantee that drift will not occur
- Thresholds, review ownership, and the recovery decision
- After retraining, how should the intervention be checked?
- Evaluate on appropriate material and continue measuring afterward
- Comparer uniquement la précision de l'entraînement
- Assume retraining fixed the cause
- Stop monitoring the old and new versions
- Why include subgroup results and sample sizes in monitoring reports?
- Averages already provide complete subgroup information
- They show which populations the reported performance actually covers
- Sample sizes never affect interpretation
- Subgroups can be inferred from the model score