社会ガイド
EU AI Act Post-Market Monitoring and Serious Incident Reporting
The EU AI Act requires providers of high-risk AI systems to operate a post-market monitoring system and report specified serious incidents.
このページでは3 分で読めます
概要
Providers and deployers have distinct duties, and serious-incident reporting is not the same as routine customer support or general model drift monitoring.
ディープダイブ
Article 72 requires providers to establish and document a post-market monitoring system proportionate to the nature of the AI technology and the risks of the high-risk system. It should actively and systematically collect, document, and analyse relevant data provided by deployers or collected through other sources about performance throughout the system’s lifetime. The system feeds updates to risk assessment and may lead to corrective action. It complements, rather than replaces, provider quality management, deployer monitoring, and other sectoral safety obligations. Article 73 covers reporting of serious incidents. Providers must report to the market surveillance authorities of the Member States where the incident occurred, subject to the Regulation’s timelines and process. The Act includes a special deadline for incidents involving death: report as soon as a causal relationship is established or suspected, and no later than ten days after awareness. Other incidents have different deadlines based on severity and awareness. Do not compress these into one rule; consult the operative article for the specific event. Deployers have duties to inform providers or relevant authorities when they identify risks or serious incidents in operation, following the channels required by the Act. They should preserve relevant logs and cooperate with investigations. A provider should establish usable reporting routes, triage evidence, protect personal data, and maintain a record of decisions. An internal ticket or user complaint may be an early signal but does not automatically meet the legal definition of a serious incident. The practical system links post-market evidence to action: detect a signal, assess whether it relates to the AI system, determine severity and reporting duties, notify the right authority within the applicable period, and take corrective measures when needed. Assign named responsibility and escalation coverage outside business hours. Make sure vendors and deployers can supply information quickly, while avoiding unsupported conclusions about causation before investigation.
戦略的影響
リスクと安全性
AI による壊滅的な被害も日常的な被害も、誰がリスクを理解し、誰が行動できるかにかかっています。
より明確な判決
国民と専門家のリテラシーは、強力な安全政策が政治的に可能かどうかを左右します。
誇大広告を打ち破る
明確な説明は、誇大広告、研究室の PR、曖昧な倫理劇場に囚われることを減らします。
The Future of EU AI Act Post-Market Monitoring and Serious Incident Reporting
The European Commission’s current timeline makes most AI Act requirements applicable from 2 August 2026, with Annex III high-risk rules delayed to 2 December 2027 and product-embedded high-risk rules to 2 August 2028. Some requirements and duties already apply earlier or under other laws, so teams must check the system category and applicable date. As oversight capacity and standards develop, organizations should update incident playbooks and authority contacts rather than assume a single calendar applies to all systems. Keep dated records of the applicable text, guidance, and decisions so teams can explain their reasoning when rules or system purposes change.
現実世界の実装
A provider detects a safety-relevant output pattern and checks the affected system versions and users.
A deployer preserves logs and notifies the provider after an AI-supported workflow contributes to a serious injury.
An incident lead records the first awareness timestamp and consults Article 73 for the applicable deadline.
A post-market review identifies a drift trend and documents corrective action before further harm occurs.
リスクとガードレール
能力が複雑になる一方で、実存的なリスクを SF として扱います。
高度な自律性の下での調整による表面製品の安全性を混乱させる。
英語以外や専門家ではない聴衆には、低品質の情報源しか提供されません。
実装ロードマップ
製品の危害、誤使用、制御不能/調整不良のリスクを分離します。
どのような証拠がタイムラインと重大度についてのあなたの見方を変えるかを尋ねてください。
マーケティング上の主張よりも、一次情報源と具体的な評価を優先します。
意識だけでなく、キャリア、政策、資金、スキルなど、行動経路を 1 つ特定します。
探検を続けましょう
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the EU AI Act Post-Market Monitoring and Serious Incident Reporting quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
よくある質問
What is EU AI Act Post-Market Monitoring and Serious Incident Reporting?
The EU AI Act requires providers of high-risk AI systems to operate a post-market monitoring system and report specified serious incidents. Providers and deployers have distinct duties, and serious-incident reporting is not the same as routine customer support or general model drift monitoring.
How does Article 72 support oversight after a high-risk system enters service?
The provider’s system collects and analyses lifetime performance information.
Where does Article 73 direct a provider to report a serious incident?
The article identifies national market surveillance authorities.
What special deadline applies to a death-related serious incident?
The Regulation sets a specific ten-day outer limit for death cases.
Does every complaint automatically qualify as a serious incident?
Complaints can trigger triage but are not automatically legally classified.
学び続ける
関連ガイド
このトピックのために選ばれたその他のガイド