À suivreGuide suivant
Loi TAKE IT DOWN et lois Deepfake non consensuelles
Société
GUIDE DE LA SOCIÉTÉ
Australia’s Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024, in force since September 3, 2024, makes non-consensual online transmission of sexual material depicting an adult a federal offence even when the image or video was digitally created or altered.
The federal offence targets transmission, with an aggravated penalty if the offender also created or altered the material; state laws and eSafety removal processes add separate protections.
The Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024 amended the federal Criminal Code and commenced on September 3, 2024, the day after Royal Assent. It replaced section 474.17A with an offence of using a carriage service to transmit sexual material without consent. The material must depict or appear to depict another person who is, or appears to be, at least 18, in a sexual pose or activity, or certain intimate body parts. The transmitter must know the person does not consent or be reckless about consent. The provision expressly makes it irrelevant whether the material is unaltered or created or altered using technology; its note specifically includes realistic false depictions such as deepfakes. The standard maximum penalty is six years’ imprisonment. Section 474.17AA adds aggravated offences. One applies when the offender has qualifying prior civil penalty orders concerning online-safety removal matters. Another applies when the offender responsible for the underlying non-consensual transmission was also responsible for creating or altering the material; the maximum penalty is seven years. This means the federal Act does not create a free-standing offence of making a sexual deepfake that is never transmitted under the provision. Other laws may apply to creation, threats, minors, offline conduct or related abuse. Child sexual abuse material provisions are separate. The eSafety Commissioner can also address image-based abuse through civil removal mechanisms under the Online Safety Act. eSafety explains that intimate images can be real or altered/faked to look like someone. State and territory criminal offences differ, so the Commonwealth Act is not the entire Australian legal framework. Reporting, removal and prosecution are distinct processes: a removal request is not itself a criminal conviction, and a platform takedown does not resolve whether an offence occurred.
Les dommages catastrophiques et quotidiens causés par l’IA dépendent tous deux de la personne qui comprend les risques et qui peut agir.
Les connaissances du public et des professionnels déterminent si une politique de sécurité forte est politiquement possible.
Des explications claires réduisent la capture par le battage médiatique, les relations publiques en laboratoire et le théâtre d'éthique vague.
The Commonwealth offence remains in force, while eSafety’s image-based abuse scheme and state/territory criminal laws operate alongside it. Check the current Criminal Code text and eSafety guidance for later amendments, and avoid collapsing criminal, civil removal and platform-policy remedies into one process. Keep a dated record of the primary source or study behind each claim and revisit conclusions when new evidence or implementation details emerge. State-law reforms and online-safety rules can add remedies, but they do not change the federal offence elements by themselves.
A person receives a sexual deepfake of an adult and reports the account that transmitted it, preserving the URL, message and time rather than reposting the file.
A platform distinguishes the federal criminal offence from an eSafety removal notice and handles each through its own reporting path.
A creator checks consent before generating a sexual image depicting a real person and does not assume that fictional or synthetic production avoids the transmission law.
A support worker checks the relevant state or territory intimate-image offences as well as Commonwealth law before describing available remedies.
Traiter le risque existentiel comme de la science-fiction alors que les capacités s’accroissent.
Confondre sécurité des produits de surface et alignement sous haute autonomie.
Laisser le public non anglophone et non expert avec uniquement des sources de mauvaise qualité.
Séparez les dommages causés aux produits, leur mauvaise utilisation et les risques de perte de contrôle/désalignement.
Demandez quelles preuves pourraient changer votre point de vue sur les délais et la gravité.
Préférez les sources primaires et les évaluations concrètes aux allégations marketing.
Identifiez une voie d’action : carrière, politique, financement ou compétences – et pas seulement la sensibilisation.
Free newsletter
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
Australia’s Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024, in force since September 3, 2024, makes non-consensual online transmission of sexual material depicting an adult a federal offence even when the image or video was digitally created or altered. The federal offence targets transmission, with an aggravated penalty if the offender also created or altered the material; state laws and eSafety removal processes add separate protections.
The Act commenced the day after Royal Assent on September 2, 2024.
Section 474.17A requires transmission via carriage service, covered sexual material, an adult subject and knowledge or recklessness as to lack of consent.
Section 474.17A makes it irrelevant whether the material is unaltered or created or altered using technology.
The statute requires knowledge or recklessness as to whether the depicted person consents to transmission.
Section 474.17AA includes an aggravated offence when the person was responsible for the underlying transmission and for creating or altering the material.
Continuez à apprendre
Plus de guides sélectionnés pour ce sujet
À suivreGuide suivant
Loi TAKE IT DOWN et lois Deepfake non consensuelles
Société