À suivreGuide suivant
Australia’s Deepfake Sexual Material Laws
Société
GUIDE DE LA SOCIÉTÉ
South Korea’s Sexual Violence Punishment Act criminalizes specified non-consensual sexualized edits or synthetic depictions of a person, and since the October 2024 amendment also criminalizes possession, purchase, storage and viewing of qualifying material.
The statute is targeted to defined sexual-content conduct, not every AI-generated image or deepfake.
Article 14-2 of South Korea’s Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes addresses certain non-consensual altered or synthetic sexual imagery. Its text covers editing, synthesis or processing of a photograph, video or audio depicting a person’s face, body or voice, against that person’s will, into a form likely to cause sexual desire or shame. The offense is tied to a real person and specified sexualized content; “deepfake” is a common label, not a substitute for the statutory elements. The 2024 amendment strengthened penalties and added liability for possession, purchase, storage or viewing. Under the current provision, creation under paragraph 1 and distribution under paragraph 2 can be punished by up to seven years’ imprisonment or a fine of up to 50 million won. Distribution for profit using an information network carries a minimum three-year sentence. A person who possesses, purchases, stores or views the covered material or copies may face up to three years’ imprisonment or a fine up to 30 million won. The amendments took effect October 16, 2024. The Act’s current consolidated text retains these penalties as of the 2025 amendment compilation. This is a criminal statute, distinct from school policies, platform moderation and civil remedies. Other laws can apply to threats, extortion, child sexual abuse material, privacy invasion or election-related fabrication. At the same time, not every synthetic or edited image is criminalized by Article 14-2; prosecutors must establish the provision’s subject, lack of consent, sexualized form and relevant conduct. The legal definition does not make a platform label a defense or render all lawful satire, fiction or nonsexual media illegal.
Les dommages catastrophiques et quotidiens causés par l’IA dépendent tous deux de la personne qui comprend les risques et qui peut agir.
Les connaissances du public et des professionnels déterminent si une politique de sécurité forte est politiquement possible.
Des explications claires réduisent la capture par le battage médiatique, les relations publiques en laboratoire et le théâtre d'éthique vague.
Korean law and enforcement practice continue to evolve, and other amendments can affect investigation, victim support or platform handling without changing Article 14-2’s elements. For current text, use the consolidated law portal and Ministry of Justice notices. Keep statute, enforcement procedure and proposed policy separate. The statute’s wording remains available in the current consolidated law. Other 2025 and 2026 reforms may affect investigation, victim support or penalties in adjacent offenses, so teams should recheck the exact provision and effective date before relying on an older summary.
A person creates a synthetic sexualized video using another person’s face without consent; investigators assess the conduct under Article 14-2’s editing offense.
A person downloads or watches a qualifying non-consensual sexual deepfake even without distributing it; the 2024 amendment added a possession/viewing offense.
An online platform receives a report about a non-consensual sexual image and considers separate content-removal and victim-support rules.
A satirical fictional image that does not depict a real person or meet the statute’s sexualized alteration elements is not automatically an Article 14-2 offense merely because it is AI-generated.
Traiter le risque existentiel comme de la science-fiction alors que les capacités s’accroissent.
Confondre sécurité des produits de surface et alignement sous haute autonomie.
Laisser le public non anglophone et non expert avec uniquement des sources de mauvaise qualité.
Séparez les dommages causés aux produits, leur mauvaise utilisation et les risques de perte de contrôle/désalignement.
Demandez quelles preuves pourraient changer votre point de vue sur les délais et la gravité.
Préférez les sources primaires et les évaluations concrètes aux allégations marketing.
Identifiez une voie d’action : carrière, politique, financement ou compétences – et pas seulement la sensibilisation.
Free newsletter
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
South Korea’s Sexual Violence Punishment Act criminalizes specified non-consensual sexualized edits or synthetic depictions of a person, and since the October 2024 amendment also criminalizes possession, purchase, storage and viewing of qualifying material. The statute is targeted to defined sexual-content conduct, not every AI-generated image or deepfake.
Article 14-2 defines covered edits of a person’s face, body or voice against their will in sexualized form.
The amended Article 14-2 provisions took effect October 16, 2024.
Article 14-2(4) sets up to three years’ imprisonment or a fine up to 30 million won.
The current text sets the maximum at seven years’ imprisonment or a 50 million won fine.
Article 14-2(3) sets a minimum three-year sentence for specified profit-driven network distribution.
Continuez à apprendre
Plus de guides sélectionnés pour ce sujet
À suivreGuide suivant
Australia’s Deepfake Sexual Material Laws
Société