アプリケーションガイド
EU AI Act Compliance Checklist
A practical EU AI Act review starts with systems and roles, then checks prohibited practices, classification, transparency, GPAI, and the obligations that apply to each actor.
このページでは3 分で読めます
概要
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 changes several timelines, so a checklist must track effective dates separately from whether a system is classified as high-risk.
ディープダイブ
Begin with scope. Article 2 reaches providers placing AI systems or GPAI models on the EU market, EU deployers, importers and distributors, and certain non-EU providers or deployers when system output is used in the Union. Record systems, model dependencies, users, jurisdictions, intended purposes, and affected people. Consider the Act’s defined exclusions and its relationship to other EU laws rather than assuming every AI-related activity is covered in the same way. Next, check the legal buckets independently. Screen for Article 5 prohibited practices; classify potential high-risk systems under both Article 6 routes; identify Article 50 transparency duties; and determine whether a model is GPAI under Chapter V. Then map operator roles and the obligations that follow: providers, deployers, importers, distributors, and general-purpose-model providers do not share one checklist. A model provider and the app provider integrating it may have separate duties. The 2026 amendment makes date tracking essential. The Act generally began applying on August 2, 2026, with exceptions. Two added Article 5 prohibitions apply from December 2, 2026. Most Chapter III requirements for Annex III high-risk systems apply from December 2, 2027, while the Article 6(1)/Annex I route applies from August 2, 2028. GPAI obligations applied earlier, from August 2, 2025, with a transition for certain models already on the market. Do not apply one date to every chapter or model. Finally, close identified gaps, assign owners, preserve evidence, and monitor deployed systems. Keep records of system versions, classification rationale, roles, required training and validation records, notices, oversight, incidents, and review dates. For Article 5 breaches, the ceiling is up to EUR 35 million or, for an undertaking, 7% of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Article 99(6) gives SMEs, including start-ups, the lower of the applicable amount or percentage; the maximum is not a prediction of a specific case outcome. Consult qualified counsel on specific compliance conclusions.
戦略的影響
ビルドの選択
AI が実際の成果を向上させるかどうかは、アプリケーション レベルの設計によって決まります。
チームとワークフロー
ワークフローを適切に統合すると、ユーザーが信頼できる生産性が向上します。
リスクと安全性
適切な範囲のユースケースにより、変更の疲労と実装のリスクが軽減されます。
The Future of EU AI Act Compliance Checklist
The Act’s delegated acts, standards, Commission guidelines, enforcement practice, and national procedures will continue to develop. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 already changes definitions and application dates, so older checklists may be inaccurate. Review the consolidated version before each product release and when its intended purpose changes. Treat public guidance as an aid to interpretation, not a replacement for the regulation or legal analysis. Keep an owner for each workstream and link evidence to the requirement it addresses. Review the register when an AI feature or user population changes.
現実世界の実装
A retailer inventories its recommendation, chatbot, and applicant-screening systems, then maps where outputs are used and who controls each service.
A provider checks Article 5 before launch, classifies any Annex III or Annex I use, and records whether an exception is supportable.
A developer supplying a GPAI model distinguishes its Article 53 provider duties from the downstream system provider’s duties.
A compliance lead tracks Article 50 transparency from August 2, 2026 separately from the delayed Chapter III Annex III and Annex I requirements.
リスクとガードレール
壊れたプロセスを自動化すると、既存の問題がさらに拡大する可能性があります。
チームが過剰に自動化し、必要な人間の判断を排除してしまう可能性があります。
出力が継続的に評価されないと、品質が変動する可能性があります。
実装ロードマップ
現在のワークフローをマッピングし、最も摩擦が大きいステップを特定します。
完全自動化の前に人間によるチェックポイントを定義します。
プロンプト、エスカレーション パス、品質基準についてユーザーをトレーニングします。
タスクレベルの結果を追跡して、持続的な価値を確認します。
探検を続けましょう
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the EU AI Act Compliance Checklist quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
よくある質問
What is EU AI Act Compliance Checklist?
A practical EU AI Act review starts with systems and roles, then checks prohibited practices, classification, transparency, GPAI, and the obligations that apply to each actor. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 changes several timelines, so a checklist must track effective dates separately from whether a system is classified as high-risk.
Which action belongs at the start of an AI Act compliance review?
The guide starts with scope and an inventory of systems, roles, intended purposes, and where outputs are used.
Why should a team screen Article 5 separately from high-risk classification?
The guide treats prohibited practices and high-risk classification as separate legal buckets.
Which reason supports mapping operator roles separately?
The Act assigns role-specific duties, and one supply chain may include several operators.
Under Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, when do most Annex III high-risk requirements apply?
The amendment sets December 2, 2027 for the main Chapter III requirements on Article 6(2)/Annex III systems.
When do the two new Article 5 points on specified intimate or child sexual abuse material apply?
Article 113 as amended sets December 2, 2026 for points (ba), (bb), and related paragraphs.
学び続ける
関連ガイド
このトピックのために選ばれたその他のガイド