Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level

AI Credit Decisions and Adverse Action Notices Quiz

Tests Regulation B's specific-reasons rule, CFPB circulars on complex models and sample forms, and pitfalls of SHAP-based reason codes.

Question 1 of 8

According to Regulation B's commentary, why is telling a denied applicant they failed to meet internal standards not enough?

Preview every question8 questions

Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.

  1. According to Regulation B's commentary, why is telling a denied applicant they failed to meet internal standards not enough?
    • It reveals confidential model details
    • Reasons must be specific and relate to the factors actually considered
    • It must be stated in at least two languages
    • Internal standards can only be disclosed by the FCRA notice
  2. What did CFPB Circular 2022-03 say about complex credit models?
    • Complex models are banned for credit decisions
    • Creditors using complex models may skip adverse action notices
    • Creditors cannot avoid the specific-reasons requirement because their technology is too complex or opaque
    • Only banks, not fintechs, must explain complex models
  3. A lender's model relies on bank-account cash-flow data, and the nearest sample form reason is only loosely related. What does Circular 2023-03 indicate?
    • The lender may use the nearest sample form reason
    • The lender must provide reasons that accurately describe the real factors, even if not on the sample form
    • The lender must stop using cash-flow data
    • The lender only needs to disclose the credit score
  4. What does Regulation B's commentary say about disclosing many reasons?
    • At least ten reasons must always be listed
    • Disclosing more than four reasons is not likely to be helpful
    • Only one reason may ever be given
    • Reasons must be listed in alphabetical order
  5. How do traditional scorecards typically generate adverse action reasons?
    • By comparing each attribute's points with the maximum possible points
    • By asking a loan officer to write reasons by hand
    • By using the applicant's income as the only reason
    • By ranking features alphabetically
  6. Why does the choice of reference point matter when using SHAP values for adverse action reasons?
    • SHAP values are identical regardless of reference
    • Attributions are measured relative to a reference, so explaining against the average applicant can differ from explaining against one near the approval cutoff
    • The reference point must be the applicant with the highest score
    • References only matter for mortgage loans
  7. Why do lenders group correlated features into reason families before ranking them?
    • To reduce the number of features the model uses
    • So attribution for one underlying factor is not diluted across several related variables
    • Because Regulation B lists required families
    • To hide which data sources the model uses
  8. Which statement reflects the guide's view of explainability libraries?
    • Running any explainability library automatically produces compliant reasons
    • Attributions can be unstable and depend on choices, so reasons need validation for accuracy and clarity
    • Explainability tools are only needed for denied mortgage applications
    • Explainability tools also prove the model is fair

Keep testing yourself

More quizzes picked for your level.

View all quizzes