Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
AI Credit Decisions and Adverse Action Notices Quiz
Tests Regulation B's specific-reasons rule, CFPB circulars on complex models and sample forms, and pitfalls of SHAP-based reason codes.
Question 1 of 8
According to Regulation B's commentary, why is telling a denied applicant they failed to meet internal standards not enough?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- According to Regulation B's commentary, why is telling a denied applicant they failed to meet internal standards not enough?
- It reveals confidential model details
- Reasons must be specific and relate to the factors actually considered
- It must be stated in at least two languages
- Internal standards can only be disclosed by the FCRA notice
- What did CFPB Circular 2022-03 say about complex credit models?
- Complex models are banned for credit decisions
- Creditors using complex models may skip adverse action notices
- Creditors cannot avoid the specific-reasons requirement because their technology is too complex or opaque
- Only banks, not fintechs, must explain complex models
- A lender's model relies on bank-account cash-flow data, and the nearest sample form reason is only loosely related. What does Circular 2023-03 indicate?
- The lender may use the nearest sample form reason
- The lender must provide reasons that accurately describe the real factors, even if not on the sample form
- The lender must stop using cash-flow data
- The lender only needs to disclose the credit score
- What does Regulation B's commentary say about disclosing many reasons?
- At least ten reasons must always be listed
- Disclosing more than four reasons is not likely to be helpful
- Only one reason may ever be given
- Reasons must be listed in alphabetical order
- How do traditional scorecards typically generate adverse action reasons?
- By comparing each attribute's points with the maximum possible points
- By asking a loan officer to write reasons by hand
- By using the applicant's income as the only reason
- By ranking features alphabetically
- Why does the choice of reference point matter when using SHAP values for adverse action reasons?
- SHAP values are identical regardless of reference
- Attributions are measured relative to a reference, so explaining against the average applicant can differ from explaining against one near the approval cutoff
- The reference point must be the applicant with the highest score
- References only matter for mortgage loans
- Why do lenders group correlated features into reason families before ranking them?
- To reduce the number of features the model uses
- So attribution for one underlying factor is not diluted across several related variables
- Because Regulation B lists required families
- To hide which data sources the model uses
- Which statement reflects the guide's view of explainability libraries?
- Running any explainability library automatically produces compliant reasons
- Attributions can be unstable and depend on choices, so reasons need validation for accuracy and clarity
- Explainability tools are only needed for denied mortgage applications
- Explainability tools also prove the model is fair
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.