AI for Deposition Summaries and Preparation Quiz

Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.

1. Which type of deposition summary groups testimony by issue rather than following transcript order?
   • Page-line summary
   • Narrative summary
   • Errata summary
   • Topical summary
2. Why does the guide warn about feeding AI a rough draft transcript?
   • It may contain errors the model will repeat in the summary
   • AI tools cannot read rough drafts
   • Rough drafts are always privileged
   • Rough drafts lack any speaker labels
3. What is a common false positive when AI searches for inconsistencies in testimony?
   • Flagging a date written in a different format
   • Missing every contradiction in the transcript
   • Treating a clarified answer as a contradiction
   • Refusing to compare more than one witness
4. Why do protective orders matter when uploading transcripts to an AI vendor?
   • They require AI summaries to be filed with the court
   • They may limit who can receive confidential testimony, so the upload must fit their terms
   • They ban all electronic copies of transcripts
   • They only apply to video depositions
5. What must be used when impeaching a witness with prior testimony found through AI?
   • The AI's summary of the testimony
   • A paraphrase approved by the court reporter
   • The rough draft transcript
   • An exact quote from the certified transcript with page and line
6. What happens when page and line numbers are stripped from a transcript before AI processing?
   • The model runs faster and cites more accurately
   • The court reporter must recertify it
   • The model has to guess locations, producing wrong citations
   • Speaker labels are automatically restored
7. What risk does chunking a long transcript create?
   • It can separate a question from its answer or an answer from a later correction
   • It permanently deletes objections from the record
   • It changes the witness's words
   • It prevents any summary from being generated
8. For inconsistency searches, what output format does the guide recommend requesting?
   • A single sentence verdict on credibility
   • Both conflicting passages side by side
   • A percentage score of witness honesty
   • Only the later of the two statements