Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
AI for Forensic Accountants Quiz
Tests Benford's law digit analysis, link analysis of related parties and fund tracing, and what makes AI-assisted findings hold up as expert evidence.
Question 1 of 8
A first-two-digit Benford test on invoices shows a spike at 49, and the company's approval limit is $5,000. How should a forensic accountant treat this result?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- A first-two-digit Benford test on invoices shows a spike at 49, and the company's approval limit is $5,000. How should a forensic accountant treat this result?
- As proof that the approver committed fraud
- As a lead suggesting purchases may have been split to stay under the limit, which needs follow-up
- As a sign the dataset is too small for Benford analysis
- As evidence that Benford's law never applies to invoices
- Which of these datasets is least suitable for Benford's law analysis?
- Vendor invoice amounts ranging from $10 to $500,000
- Employee expense claims across many sizes
- Sequentially assigned invoice numbers
- Sales totals by customer over a year
- Under Benford's law, roughly how often should the leading digit be 1 in a conforming dataset?
- About 30 percent of the time
- About 11 percent of the time
- About 46 percent of the time
- About 5 percent of the time
- Why do practitioners often prefer mean absolute deviation over chi-square when testing Benford conformity on very large datasets?
- Mean absolute deviation needs no computer to calculate
- Chi-square only works on second-digit tests
- Mean absolute deviation automatically identifies the fraudster
- Chi-square treats trivial deviations as significant when the dataset is large
- Link analysis reveals that a supplier is registered at a company director's home address. What does this most directly suggest?
- The supplier's invoices follow Benford's law
- The director has a conflict of interest that was properly disclosed
- A possible undisclosed related party relationship
- A problem with the tracing method chosen
- In fund tracing through commingled accounts, what decides whether a method such as the lowest intermediate balance rule is used?
- The default setting of the tracing software
- A legal choice about which tracing convention applies
- The number of transactions in the account
- Whether the data conforms to Benford's law
- What do Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert standard require of expert testimony in US federal courts?
- That every finding be produced by machine learning
- That the expert use only Benford's law
- That the analysis cover the entire population of transactions
- That the testimony rest on reliable methods that were properly applied
- When resolving entities for link analysis, which shared attribute gives the strongest evidence that two records belong to the same party?
- A shared bank account number
- A shared surname
- A shared city
- A shared industry code
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.