Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
AI Full-Population Testing in Audits Quiz
Tests how 100% transaction analysis differs from audit sampling, what it cannot prove about data completeness, and how to triage large exception sets.
Question 1 of 8
When an auditor runs a three-way match on every purchase invoice instead of a sample, what is eliminated for that attribute?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- When an auditor runs a three-way match on every purchase invoice instead of a sample, what is eliminated for that attribute?
- The need to evaluate exceptions
- The risk that the data extract is incomplete
- Sampling risk
- The need for IT general controls
- Why does testing 100 percent of recorded purchases not prove that liabilities are complete?
- Unrecorded liabilities never appear in the recorded data being analyzed
- Analytics cannot read invoice amounts
- Purchases are never matched to receiving records
- Sampling standards forbid full-population tests
- Before running full-population tests, what step does the guide say proves the population?
- Asking management to confirm the file is complete
- Running a Benford test on the amounts
- Selecting a random sample of 25 items
- Reconciling the extract to the general ledger or trial balance using record counts and control totals
- A cutoff test flags 4,000 items, most of which look like timing differences. Which response fits the guide's approach?
- Ignore the flags because most are probably harmless
- Group the flags by shared cause, investigate each group, refine the rule and rerun it
- Report all 4,000 items as misstatements
- Switch back to testing a sample and discard the analysis
- How should an auditor treat an item flagged by a full-population test?
- As an item that needs investigation, not automatically a misstatement
- As a confirmed misstatement to be booked
- As evidence that controls failed completely
- As a sampling error
- An auditor examines 25 items from a group of 2,000 flagged items and draws conclusions about all 2,000. What applies to that step?
- Nothing, because full-population testing was already done
- Only the rules on IT general controls
- The audit sampling requirements
- Benford's law thresholds
- What has been a growing focus for auditing standard-setters and regulators regarding full-population testing?
- Banning audit sampling entirely
- How auditors should respond to large numbers of items flagged by technology-assisted analysis
- Requiring Benford's law in every audit
- Eliminating the need for performance materiality
- Why can an invoice that passes a perfect three-way match still be a problem?
- Three-way matches cannot be run on complete populations
- The test was not run by a licensed CPA
- Receiving records are always unreliable
- The test checks only the rule written, and a fake vendor can still produce matching records
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.