Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
AI in Suicide Risk Prediction Quiz
Tests the base-rate problem behind low positive predictive value, capacity-based thresholds, and ethical, non-coercive outreach after a risk flag.
Question 1 of 8
A model with 90 percent sensitivity and specificity is applied where 100 of 100,000 patients attempt suicide. Roughly what share of flagged patients will actually attempt?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- A model with 90 percent sensitivity and specificity is applied where 100 of 100,000 patients attempt suicide. Roughly what share of flagged patients will actually attempt?
- About 90 percent
- About 50 percent
- Under 1 percent
- About 10 percent
- According to the guide, what are suicide risk models best understood as?
- Tools that identify who will die by suicide
- Tools for prioritizing limited clinical attention
- Replacements for clinical assessment
- Legal evidence for involuntary commitment
- Roughly what share of risk scores does the VA's REACH VET program flag for review?
- The top 50 percent
- The top 10 percent
- The top 0.1 percent
- Every veteran with a mental health diagnosis
- Why do health systems often set flagging thresholds by capacity?
- So they flag only as many patients as staff can meaningfully contact
- Because regulators require exactly 100 flags per month
- To maximize the number of false positives
- Because the models cannot produce scores below a set value
- Which response to a risk flag fits the ethical practice described in the guide?
- Sharing the flag with the patient's employer
- Voluntary outreach, safety planning and discussing safe storage of lethal means
- Automatically canceling the patient's firearm license
- Not telling the patient or clinician anything
- What does calibration mean for a suicide risk model?
- How fast the model runs
- Whether predicted risk levels match observed rates, such as a 2 percent prediction corresponding to about 2 percent observed
- Whether the model ranks patients in order
- How many variables the model uses
- Why do these models need periodic revalidation?
- Changes in coding practice, screening workflows or care patterns can quietly degrade performance
- Software licenses expire yearly
- Patients' names change
- Revalidation increases the base rate of suicide
- Which kind of evidence does the guide describe as strongest for these programs?
- High retrospective accuracy on historical records
- Vendor marketing materials
- Prospective evaluation showing that flag-triggered outreach reduces attempts
- A large number of input variables
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.