Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
AI in Insurance Quiz
Tests decision accountability, proxy risks, appeals, applicable requirements, group outcomes, records, and policyholder recourse.
Question 1 of 8
Why is a predictive score not a complete underwriting decision?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- Why is a predictive score not a complete underwriting decision?
- It does not by itself establish fair use, lawful relevance, explanation, or review
- A score cannot rank records
- Every insurer uses identical data
- Only human decisions can be measured
- A claims model reduces payments but appeals rise. What should the insurer investigate?
- Whether the model’s name changed
- Whether more images were stored
- Whether the benchmark score improved
- Whether wrongful denials or delays increased, not just the payment total
- What should be checked before using third-party or credit-related features?
- Only the feature’s predictive strength
- Whether the field is numeric
- Permitted use, provenance, and whether the feature acts as an irrelevant or protected proxy
- If the vendor provides a dashboard
- Why monitor appeals, overrides, and complaints after deployment?
- They prove the score is accurate
- They can reveal errors or harms not visible in model metrics
- They replace group outcome analysis
- They are unrelated to customer outcomes
- What does the NAIC Model Bulletin imply about insurer AI-supported decisions?
- The bulletin approves all insurer models
- A model removes the need for governance
- All state requirements are identical
- They remain subject to applicable insurance laws, including unfair discrimination rules
- Which record helps explain an AI-supported claim outcome?
- Model version, vendor data, reasons, human review, and corrective action
- Only the final payment amount
- The model’s parameter count
- A copy of the customer’s unrelated policies
- Why evaluate across relevant claim conditions and groups?
- A single average guarantees fairness
- Errors can vary by claimant or claim context despite acceptable overall accuracy
- Different conditions cannot affect model error
- Group checks replace case review
- What should a policyholder be able to do where required?
- Change the model’s training data directly
- Access other customers’ claims
- Ask questions about and challenge an outcome through an appropriate path
- Approve the insurer’s vendor
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.