Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
AI and Patent Inventorship: The DABUS Cases Quiz
Tests the DABUS rulings across the US, UK, Europe and Australia, the natural-person inventor rule, and USPTO standards for AI-assisted inventorship.
Question 1 of 8
Which two inventions did Stephen Thaler say DABUS created on its own?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- Which two inventions did Stephen Thaler say DABUS created on its own?
- A self-driving delivery robot and a battery cooling system
- A food container with a fractal surface and a flashing emergency light
- A cancer drug molecule and a protein-folding method
- A solar panel coating and a water filtration membrane
- What did the US Federal Circuit decide in Thaler v. Vidal (2022)?
- AI-assisted inventions can never be patented
- Thaler should be named inventor in place of DABUS
- The word "individuals" in the Patent Act means natural persons
- The USPTO must create a new category for AI inventors
- What did the UK Supreme Court rule in December 2023?
- An inventor under the Patents Act 1977 must be a natural person
- DABUS could be named inventor if Thaler co-signed
- UK patents may name AI as inventor for software inventions
- The case should be sent to the European Patent Office
- Why does South Africa's 2021 DABUS patent carry little legal weight?
- It was revoked within a week
- It named Thaler rather than DABUS
- It covered only design rights, not inventions
- South Africa does not substantively examine patent applications
- How did the DABUS litigation go in Australia?
- The High Court ruled that AI can be an inventor
- Australia never received a DABUS application
- A single judge accepted DABUS in 2021, and the Full Federal Court reversed that in 2022
- The patent office granted the patent without any court case
- Which statement about AI-assisted inventions is accurate according to this guide?
- Any use of AI in research makes an invention unpatentable
- They can be patented when a human makes a significant contribution to the invention
- They can be patented only in South Africa
- They must name the AI as a co-inventor alongside humans
- Under the USPTO's February 2024 guidance, which activity could count as a significant human contribution?
- Owning the AI system that produced the invention
- Supervising the computer the AI runs on
- Presenting a general problem to the AI
- Writing a prompt designed to produce a specific solution
- Why should teams keep dated records of prompts, outputs and human decisions?
- Errors in naming inventors can make a patent invalid or unenforceable
- The law requires AI outputs to be published before filing
- Records let the AI be named as inventor later
- Patent offices charge lower fees when records are attached
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.