Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level

AI and Patent Inventorship: The DABUS Cases Quiz

Tests the DABUS rulings across the US, UK, Europe and Australia, the natural-person inventor rule, and USPTO standards for AI-assisted inventorship.

Related guide pathsAI Patent Inventorship Dabus
Question 1 of 8

Which two inventions did Stephen Thaler say DABUS created on its own?

Preview every question8 questions

Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.

  1. Which two inventions did Stephen Thaler say DABUS created on its own?
    • A self-driving delivery robot and a battery cooling system
    • A food container with a fractal surface and a flashing emergency light
    • A cancer drug molecule and a protein-folding method
    • A solar panel coating and a water filtration membrane
  2. What did the US Federal Circuit decide in Thaler v. Vidal (2022)?
    • AI-assisted inventions can never be patented
    • Thaler should be named inventor in place of DABUS
    • The word "individuals" in the Patent Act means natural persons
    • The USPTO must create a new category for AI inventors
  3. What did the UK Supreme Court rule in December 2023?
    • An inventor under the Patents Act 1977 must be a natural person
    • DABUS could be named inventor if Thaler co-signed
    • UK patents may name AI as inventor for software inventions
    • The case should be sent to the European Patent Office
  4. Why does South Africa's 2021 DABUS patent carry little legal weight?
    • It was revoked within a week
    • It named Thaler rather than DABUS
    • It covered only design rights, not inventions
    • South Africa does not substantively examine patent applications
  5. How did the DABUS litigation go in Australia?
    • The High Court ruled that AI can be an inventor
    • Australia never received a DABUS application
    • A single judge accepted DABUS in 2021, and the Full Federal Court reversed that in 2022
    • The patent office granted the patent without any court case
  6. Which statement about AI-assisted inventions is accurate according to this guide?
    • Any use of AI in research makes an invention unpatentable
    • They can be patented when a human makes a significant contribution to the invention
    • They can be patented only in South Africa
    • They must name the AI as a co-inventor alongside humans
  7. Under the USPTO's February 2024 guidance, which activity could count as a significant human contribution?
    • Owning the AI system that produced the invention
    • Supervising the computer the AI runs on
    • Presenting a general problem to the AI
    • Writing a prompt designed to produce a specific solution
  8. Why should teams keep dated records of prompts, outputs and human decisions?
    • Errors in naming inventors can make a patent invalid or unenforceable
    • The law requires AI outputs to be published before filing
    • Records let the AI be named as inventor later
    • Patent offices charge lower fees when records are attached

Keep testing yourself

More quizzes picked for your level.

View all quizzes