Guide-linked quiz · Easy Level
AI Tools for Lawyers: A Practical Overview Quiz
Tests the four legal AI tool types, how retrieval-augmented research tools reduce but do not remove errors, and where lawyer judgment stays required.
Question 1 of 8
Which 2012 decision does the guide credit with early judicial acceptance of technology-assisted review?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- Which 2012 decision does the guide credit with early judicial acceptance of technology-assisted review?
- Mata v. Avianca
- Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe
- Park v. Kim
- Wadsworth v. Walmart
- What did the 2024 Stanford study find about database-backed legal research AI tools?
- They never cited nonexistent cases
- They only made errors when answering statute questions
- They performed worse than general chatbots on every test
- They still gave incorrect or misgrounded answers on a meaningful share of test queries
- According to the guide, where do AI drafting tools save the most time?
- Routine, well-patterned documents
- Novel arguments on unsettled questions
- Oral argument preparation
- Negotiating fees with clients
- Which risks does the guide single out for client intake tools?
- Slow website load times and broken links
- Billing clients for time the tool saved
- Giving legal advice to a non-client, missing conflicts and mishandling sensitive information
- Citing overruled cases in a brief
- In retrieval-augmented generation, what happens before the language model writes an answer?
- The model writes a draft and then searches for supporting cases
- The system searches its database and passes the top passages to the model
- The user must upload every relevant case manually
- The question is converted into a Boolean query and nothing else
- Which three checks does the guide recommend for every AI research answer?
- Check the font, the page count and the filing deadline
- Ask the AI to confirm, ask a colleague, then file
- Check the vendor name, the price and the database size
- Confirm the authority exists, says what the summary claims, and is still good law
- Why does the guide say lawyers validate AI document review results with sampling?
- Because the output is statistical rather than certain
- Because courts forbid any AI use in discovery
- Because sampling replaces the need for attorney review
- Because AI review tools cannot read emails
- What belief does the guide say lawyers should drop about legal-specific AI tools?
- That they cost more than general chatbots
- That they only work in Microsoft Word
- That they are safe to rely on while general chatbots are not
- That they cannot summarize statutes
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.