Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
Circular 230 and AI for Tax Professionals Quiz
Tests how Circular 230's diligence, competence and written-advice duties apply to AI output, plus confidentiality limits on client data.
Question 1 of 8
How does Circular 230 address artificial intelligence specifically?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- How does Circular 230 address artificial intelligence specifically?
- It bans AI use by enrolled agents
- It has no AI-specific rules, but its existing duties apply to AI-assisted work
- It requires registering AI tools with the IRS
- It exempts AI-drafted advice from review
- Under section 10.22, when may a practitioner rely on the work product of another source?
- Always, if the source is software
- Only when they used reasonable care in engaging, supervising, training and evaluating that source
- Never under any circumstances
- Only if the client signs a waiver
- Section 10.35 imposes which duty?
- Competence
- Advertising disclosure
- Fee limits
- Continuing education hours
- An AI draft of written advice assumes facts the client never provided. Under section 10.37, what is the problem?
- Written advice may not exceed two pages
- Advice must rest on reasonable factual assumptions and consider relevant facts
- AI drafts must be signed by the IRS
- Section 10.37 only covers marketing
- Which provisions outside Circular 230 penalize preparers for unauthorized disclosure of tax return information?
- Internal Revenue Code sections 7216 and 6713
- Section 10.34 only
- The Loving v. IRS decision
- The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
- What did Loving v. IRS (2014) mean for Circular 230?
- It extended Circular 230 to all software vendors
- It limited the IRS's authority over unenrolled preparers' return-preparation work
- It abolished the Office of Professional Responsibility
- It required AI disclosures on every return
- Which practice best satisfies the diligence duty when AI output cites authority?
- Accepting the citation if it is formatted correctly
- Asking the same AI tool whether its citation is correct
- Verifying each cited authority in primary sources such as the Code, regulations or court opinions
- Removing all citations from client memos
- A practitioner says the AI tool, not she, is responsible for an error in client advice. How does the guide treat this?
- Correct, responsibility shifts to the vendor
- Correct, if the tool is enterprise-grade
- Incorrect, citing an AI tool does not shift professional responsibility
- Incorrect, but only for attorneys
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.