Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level

Feature Selection Methods Quiz

Compare filter, wrapper and embedded feature selection, and recognize leakage, redundancy and limits of variable importance.

Related guide pathsFeature Selection Methods
Question 1 of 8

How does feature selection differ from principal component analysis?

Preview every question8 questions

Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.

  1. How does feature selection differ from principal component analysis?
    • Selection and PCA both construct the same linear projections
    • Selection chooses data rows while PCA chooses original columns
    • Selection retains input variables; PCA constructs transformed components
    • Selection is necessarily unsupervised while PCA requires class labels
  2. A univariate filter may miss a variable that is useful only through what?
    • Its variance considered in isolation
    • An interaction with another feature
    • The column's frequency of missing values alone
    • Its linear correlation with the target alone
  3. What makes recursive feature elimination a wrapper method?
    • It computes only a label-free variance threshold
    • It transforms every feature into a principal component
    • It fixes an initial feature ranking without refitting
    • It repeatedly fits an estimator to judge feature subsets
  4. An L1-regularized linear model sets some coefficients to zero during fitting. This is an example of which family?
    • Embedded selection
    • An estimator-independent univariate filter
    • An external search that refits every candidate subset
    • An unsupervised component projection
  5. Why must supervised feature selection be repeated inside each training fold?
    • To guarantee identical selected variables in every fold
    • To avoid tuning the selected subset size
    • To prevent held-out labels from affecting the selected subset
    • To make training accuracy an unbiased test score
  6. How should high mutual information with a target be interpreted?
    • Evidence of statistical dependence, not proof of causation
    • Proof the feature will help every estimator
    • Proof the feature is independent of others
    • A guarantee of stable performance in production
  7. Two correlated variables split a tree model's importance. What should an analyst conclude?
    • Both variables are proven useless
    • The lower score proves negative causation
    • Importance scores are unaffected by correlation
    • Importance can be distributed among substitutes, so inspect redundancy
  8. A selected subset changes greatly across resamples. Which diagnostic is most directly relevant?
    • Selection stability across resamples
    • The training score from a single fitted subset
    • The marginal variance of one selected column
    • The number of input variables before selection

Keep testing yourself

More quizzes picked for your level.

View all quizzes