Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Feature Selection Methods Quiz
Compare filter, wrapper and embedded feature selection, and recognize leakage, redundancy and limits of variable importance.
Question 1 of 8
How does feature selection differ from principal component analysis?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- How does feature selection differ from principal component analysis?
- Selection and PCA both construct the same linear projections
- Selection chooses data rows while PCA chooses original columns
- Selection retains input variables; PCA constructs transformed components
- Selection is necessarily unsupervised while PCA requires class labels
- A univariate filter may miss a variable that is useful only through what?
- Its variance considered in isolation
- An interaction with another feature
- The column's frequency of missing values alone
- Its linear correlation with the target alone
- What makes recursive feature elimination a wrapper method?
- It computes only a label-free variance threshold
- It transforms every feature into a principal component
- It fixes an initial feature ranking without refitting
- It repeatedly fits an estimator to judge feature subsets
- An L1-regularized linear model sets some coefficients to zero during fitting. This is an example of which family?
- Embedded selection
- An estimator-independent univariate filter
- An external search that refits every candidate subset
- An unsupervised component projection
- Why must supervised feature selection be repeated inside each training fold?
- To guarantee identical selected variables in every fold
- To avoid tuning the selected subset size
- To prevent held-out labels from affecting the selected subset
- To make training accuracy an unbiased test score
- How should high mutual information with a target be interpreted?
- Evidence of statistical dependence, not proof of causation
- Proof the feature will help every estimator
- Proof the feature is independent of others
- A guarantee of stable performance in production
- Two correlated variables split a tree model's importance. What should an analyst conclude?
- Both variables are proven useless
- The lower score proves negative causation
- Importance scores are unaffected by correlation
- Importance can be distributed among substitutes, so inspect redundancy
- A selected subset changes greatly across resamples. Which diagnostic is most directly relevant?
- Selection stability across resamples
- The training score from a single fitted subset
- The marginal variance of one selected column
- The number of input variables before selection
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.