Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
Fine-Tuning Whisper Quiz
Plan Whisper adaptation using aligned audio-text pairs, clean speaker splits, model-size tradeoffs and robust evaluation for forgetting.
Question 1 of 8
What changes during supervised fine-tuning of Whisper?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- What changes during supervised fine-tuning of Whisper?
- Only the decoded transcript is edited after inference
- Only the language label is changed without training
- Model weights are updated using paired audio and text examples
- Only a static list of spellings is appended to the output
- Why must audio and transcript segments be aligned?
- Alignment guarantees the same GPU memory use for every segment
- Misaligned text teaches the model incorrect speech-to-text mappings
- An alignment error is harmless if the transcript contains domain vocabulary
- Correct timing guarantees that every transcript word is accurate
- To assess performance on unseen speakers when each speaker contributes many recordings, how should the data be partitioned?
- Randomly split overlapping windows from each speaker
- Place every speaker in every partition
- Use test speakers during training only
- Group by speaker before creating train, validation and test splits
- What does a held-out validation set support during fine-tuning?
- Checkpoint and hyperparameter decisions
- Unlimited tuning followed by an unbiased final score on that same set
- Gradient updates using every held-out label
- A guarantee that the final deployment distribution will be unchanged
- What can differ between two word error rate reports?
- Only the number of model parameters
- Only the loss observed on the training set
- Text normalization and tokenization conventions
- Only whether both systems use the same tokenizer name
- Why monitor a general-domain set while adapting to a narrow domain?
- General data always lowers target accuracy
- Target adaptation can reduce performance outside its training distribution
- The test set should be used for gradient updates
- The model size changes automatically
- What can low-rank adapters offer when the selected implementation supports them?
- Guaranteed lower WER in every domain
- Automatic correction of mislabeled transcripts
- A guarantee that no general-domain behavior can change
- Fewer trainable parameters during adaptation
- Why compare fine-tuning with decoding adjustments or domain-term support?
- Training may add cost when simpler changes solve the problem
- Decoding choices always change model weights
- Fine-tuning cannot affect vocabulary behavior
- A baseline makes test labels unnecessary
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.