Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
GARCH Volatility Models Quiz
Understand how past shocks and variance drive GARCH forecasts, and distinguish conditional volatility from return direction and realized risk.
Question 1 of 8
Which terms drive the next variance in a GARCH(1,1) model?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- Which terms drive the next variance in a GARCH(1,1) model?
- A constant, past squared innovation and past conditional variance
- Only the current return sign
- The next observed return and its future error
- The number of features and clusters
- What does a large recent squared shock tend to do to conditional variance?
- Set the expected return direction to positive
- Raise the next variance forecast through the ARCH term
- Force beta to zero
- Make realized variance known exactly
- Can a GARCH variance forecast determine whether the next return is positive or negative?
- Yes, beta is the return sign
- Yes, higher variance means a positive return
- No, it models conditional variance rather than return direction
- Only if the variance forecast is zero
- What do standardized residuals help assess?
- The exact future loss amount
- Whether feature names are ordered
- The number of seasonal periods
- Whether innovations scaled by fitted volatility retain structure
- Why inspect squared standardized residuals?
- To estimate the mean return direction
- To look for remaining volatility clustering
- To calculate a classification threshold
- To test whether all shocks are positive
- Under standard GARCH(1,1) assumptions, what does alpha+beta near one suggest?
- A known positive return
- No effect of past variance
- Highly persistent volatility shocks
- A zero conditional variance
- Why might a heavy-tailed innovation distribution be considered?
- It makes the mean equation unnecessary
- It guarantees every tail event is predicted
- It sets conditional variance to zero
- Financial returns may produce more extreme observations than a normal model captures
- Which measurement caveat applies when validating a variance forecast against realized variance?
- The proxy itself is noisy and imperfectly measured
- A proxy is always the true conditional variance
- Only the return mean can be evaluated
- The forecast horizon no longer matters
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.