Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
Influence Functions for Training Data Attribution Quiz
Checks influence-function counterfactuals, Hessian approximations, the meaning of influence signs and data attribution in language models.
Question 1 of 8
What counterfactual question do influence functions approximate?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- What counterfactual question do influence functions approximate?
- How the loss on a test point would change if a training example were removed or up-weighted
- How accurate the model is on average
- How fast the model trains
- How many parameters the model has
- Which mathematical object makes exact influence computation intractable for large models?
- The softmax function
- The inverse Hessian of the loss
- The learning rate schedule
- The batch size
- Who adapted influence functions to modern deep learning in a well-known 2017 paper?
- Goodfellow and Bengio
- Vaswani et al.
- Koh and Liang
- Hinton and LeCun
- Under Koh and Liang’s standard I_up,loss convention, what does a negative value indicate?
- The point was not in the training data
- Upweighting the point is estimated to increase test loss
- The point has no relationship to the test example
- Upweighting the point is estimated to lower test loss, so it is helpful
- Which approximation did Anthropic use to scale influence functions to large language models?
- EK-FAC (Kronecker-factored curvature)
- Dropout
- Beam search
- Mixup
- What did Anthropic's scaled study find about influential examples?
- They are always exact copies of the output
- They often share abstract patterns rather than identical wording
- They are randomly distributed
- Only the first training example matters
- In the influence-function approximation, what connects a training-example gradient to the effect on a test loss?
- The test set’s token count
- A random forest over training labels
- The inverse Hessian of the training loss
- The model’s output vocabulary size
- If removing one training example is estimated to increase a test point’s loss, what does that suggest about the example?
- It was guaranteed to be a duplicate
- It had no relationship to the model
- It necessarily caused the model to overfit
- It had a helpful influence on that test point under the approximation
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.