Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Linear Probing and Frozen Feature Evaluation Quiz
Checks what linear probes measure, how to compare frozen layers and why probe accuracy alone cannot establish causal use or robustness.
Question 1 of 8
In a standard linear probe, which parameters are updated during training?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- In a standard linear probe, which parameters are updated during training?
- Only the newly added linear classifier on top
- The entire backbone plus the linear layer
- Only the backbone, leaving the classifier fixed
- The embedding layer and the final attention block
- What does high linear-probe accuracy most directly show?
- The backbone causally uses the feature for every prediction
- The labels are decodable by a linear classifier from the frozen features under that dataset and protocol
- The representation is robust to every distribution shift
- The probe has identified a human-interpretable mechanism
- Compared with full fine-tuning, linear probing is primarily attractive because it is:
- More accurate on every task
- Guaranteed to generalize better out of distribution
- Cheaper in compute and memory and gives a cleaner read on feature quality
- The only way to use a pretrained model
- A common empirical finding when probing transformers is that:
- The final layer always gives the best probe accuracy
- Probing only works on convolutional networks
- Layer choice never affects probe results
- Intermediate layers often outperform the last layer for transfer
- Beyond benchmarking, linear probes are increasingly used in interpretability to:
- Detect whether a concept like truthfulness is encoded in hidden states
- Compress models for mobile deployment
- Replace the optimizer during pretraining
- Generate new training data automatically
- A key methodological risk when interpreting a high probe accuracy is that:
- The backbone secretly keeps training
- The probe might be exploiting a spurious correlation rather than the true concept
- Linear probes cannot overfit
- Cross-entropy loss cannot be used
- To compare two backbone layers with linear probes, what should remain consistent?
- The feature vectors from each layer
- The layer being evaluated
- The task labels, data split and probe-training protocol
- The activation values themselves
- Why might feature normalization and learning-rate sweeps be used in a probe evaluation?
- To update the frozen backbone
- To add hidden nonlinear layers to the probe
- To guarantee the concept is causally used
- To reduce optimization and scale effects that could distort the representation comparison
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.