Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Log and Box-Cox Transformations Quiz
Compare log, Box-Cox and Yeo-Johnson transforms, including domain restrictions, leakage, inverse predictions and scale interpretation.
Question 1 of 8
What effect can a logarithm have on a strongly right-skewed positive variable?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- What effect can a logarithm have on a strongly right-skewed positive variable?
- Adds the same constant to every large value
- Guarantees a normal distribution for every sample
- Compresses large values relative to small ones
- Converts every signed value to a positive value without changing its meaning
- What input restriction applies to the standard Box-Cox transformation?
- All inputs must be nonnegative, including zero
- Inputs must be strictly positive
- Inputs must already follow a normal distribution
- Inputs must lie between zero and one
- Which transformation family can accommodate zero and negative values without an arbitrary shift?
- Standard Box-Cox
- Plain natural logarithm
- Square root of every signed value
- Yeo-Johnson
- Why must a learned transformation be fitted only on each training fold?
- To prevent validation or test data from influencing fitted parameters
- To guarantee identical distributions in every evaluation fold
- To force every model family to use the same input representation
- To permit new fitted mappings at inference without a model update
- What should happen to predictions from a model trained on log-transformed targets?
- Treat log predictions directly as original-unit amounts
- Round log predictions before applying every inverse
- Apply a justified inverse mapping to recover original units
- Assume exponentiation always returns the original-scale conditional mean
- Why may exponentiating a mean log prediction fail to equal the original-scale conditional mean?
- The exponential function is linear on prediction ranges
- Nonlinear inverse transformations do not preserve averages
- Every log-scale mean equals the original-scale mean
- Transforming the target removes all variation around its conditional mean
- Which statement about a more Gaussian-looking feature is sound?
- It guarantees unbiased estimates for every estimator
- It proves extreme observations were removed
- It guarantees the same gain for trees and linear models
- It does not guarantee improved held-out prediction
- Which issue is introduced by adding an arbitrary constant before taking logs?
- The transformed scale and interpretation depend on that choice
- The transform becomes the standard Box-Cox family
- All negative values become meaningfully comparable
- It guarantees an unbiased original-scale mean
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.